CSL vs. NVT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) and nVent Electric plc (NVT).

Performance

CSL vs. NVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) and nVent Electric plc (NVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CSL vs. NVT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CSL Carlisle Companies Incorporated	4.58%	-12.26%	19.14%	34.26%	-4.08%	60.64%	-1.96%	63.10%	-5.34%
NVT nVent Electric plc	16.21%	51.27%	16.63%	55.98%	3.32%	67.15%	-5.68%	17.24%	0.18%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CSL : $13.95B NVT : $19.40B
EPS CSL : $17.27 NVT : $4.33
PE Ratio CSL : 19.32 NVT : 27.33
PEG Ratio CSL : 0.50 NVT : 0.66
PS Ratio CSL : 2.85 NVT : 4.99
PB Ratio CSL : 7.77 NVT : 5.20
Total Revenue (TTM) CSL : $5.02B NVT : $3.89B
Gross Profit (TTM) CSL : $1.41B NVT : $1.47B
EBITDA (TTM) CSL : $1.16B NVT : $612.20M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSL achieves a 4.58% return, which is significantly lower than NVT's 16.21% return.

CSL

• 1D: 2.38%
• 1M: -15.49%
• YTD: 4.58%
• 6M: 2.05%
• 1Y: -0.88%
• 3Y*: 15.12%
• 5Y*: 16.07%
• 10Y*: 14.23%

NVT

• 1D: 4.90%
• 1M: -0.07%
• YTD: 16.21%
• 6M: 20.38%
• 1Y: 127.94%
• 3Y*: 41.82%
• 5Y*: 34.84%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CSL vs. NVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSL

CSL Risk / Return Rank: 38
CSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
CSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
CSL Omega Ratio Rank: 35
CSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
CSL Martin Ratio Rank: 40

NVT

NVT Risk / Return Rank: 96
NVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
NVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
NVT Omega Ratio Rank: 94
NVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
NVT Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSL vs. NVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) and nVent Electric plc (NVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSL	NVT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.02	2.92	-2.95
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.23	3.41	-3.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.47	-0.44
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.05	7.10	-7.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.09	23.37	-23.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSL vs. NVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSL Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the NVT Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSL and NVT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSL	NVT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02	2.92	-2.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	1.00	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.68	-0.16

Correlation

The correlation between CSL and NVT is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CSL vs. NVT - Dividend Comparison

CSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, more than NVT's 0.68% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSL Carlisle Companies Incorporated	1.29%	1.31%	1.00%	1.02%	1.09%	0.86%	1.31%	1.11%	1.53%	1.27%	1.18%	1.24%
NVT nVent Electric plc	0.68%	0.78%	1.12%	1.18%	1.82%	1.84%	3.01%	2.74%	1.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CSL vs. NVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSL drawdown since its inception was -64.56%, which is greater than NVT's maximum drawdown of -56.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSL and NVT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSL	NVT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.56%	-56.18%	-8.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.67%	-17.71%	-13.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.72%	-46.67%	+8.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.47%	-6.87%	-22.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.24%	-12.05%	-0.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.97%	5.38%	+11.59%

Volatility

CSL vs. NVT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) is 9.57%, while nVent Electric plc (NVT) has a volatility of 17.51%. This indicates that CSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSL	NVT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.57%	17.51%	-7.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.75%	30.10%	-7.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.26%	44.05%	-7.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.36%	35.03%	-4.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.38%	38.17%	-8.79%

Financials

CSL vs. NVT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Carlisle Companies Incorporated and nVent Electric plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CSL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NVT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a gross profit of 388.90M and revenue of 1.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.5%.

CSL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported an operating income of 190.00M and revenue of 1.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.9%.

NVT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, nVent Electric plc reported an operating income of 163.80M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.

CSL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported a net income of 127.40M and revenue of 1.13B, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.

NVT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a net income of 118.90M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in a net margin of 11.2%.