ENZL vs. FLAU

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

ENZL (iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF) and FLAU (Franklin FTSE Australia ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ENZL is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI New Zealand Investable Market Index, while FLAU is a Australia Equities fund tracking the FTSE Australia RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ENZL returned -3.33%/yr vs 6.97%/yr for FLAU. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ENZL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLAU.

Performance

ENZL vs. FLAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) and Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENZL achieves a 3.12% return, which is significantly lower than FLAU's 10.08% return.

ENZL

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 0.96%
• 6M: 2.31%
• YTD: 3.12%
• 1Y: 3.77%
• 3Y*: -0.43%
• 5Y*: -3.33%
• 10Y*: 3.32%

FLAU

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: -1.48%
• 6M: 7.86%
• YTD: 10.08%
• 1Y: 13.49%
• 3Y*: 11.31%
• 5Y*: 6.97%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENZL vs. FLAU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ENZL iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF	3.12%	2.47%	-4.86%	2.95%	-16.18%	-11.39%	20.04%	30.09%	0.35%	6.28%
FLAU Franklin FTSE Australia ETF	10.08%	15.95%	1.81%	12.58%	-5.58%	9.90%	11.00%	23.38%	-10.17%	1.89%

Correlation

The correlation between ENZL and FLAU is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.62

The correlation between ENZL and FLAU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

ENZL vs. FLAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ENZL	FLAU
Industrials	31.4%	5.6%
Healthcare	29.3%	4.3%
Utilities	12.9%	1.6%
Real Estate	12.9%	6.0%
Communication Services	4.0%	1.9%
Basic Materials	3.8%	26.6%
Energy	1.9%	4.8%
Financial Services	1.4%	37.1%
Consumer Defensive	1.3%	3.7%
Consumer Cyclical	1.0%	6.6%
Technology	0.5%	1.8%

Return for Risk

ENZL vs. FLAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENZL

ENZL Risk / Return Rank: 13
ENZL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
ENZL Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
ENZL Omega Ratio Rank: 12
ENZL Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
ENZL Martin Ratio Rank: 14

FLAU

FLAU Risk / Return Rank: 28
FLAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
FLAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
FLAU Omega Ratio Rank: 25
FLAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FLAU Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENZL vs. FLAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) and Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ENZL	FLAU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.24	0.80	-0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.45	1.20	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.15	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.29	1.35	-1.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.78	3.81	-3.03

ENZL vs. FLAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENZL Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the FLAU Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENZL and FLAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ENZL vs. FLAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENZL drawdown since its inception was -42.44%, smaller than the maximum FLAU drawdown of -45.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENZL and FLAU.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENZL	FLAU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.44%	-45.73%	+3.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.90%	-10.01%	-2.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.67%	-22.03%	+1.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.86%	-24.68%	-12.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.02%	-3.46%	-23.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.89%	-6.75%	-6.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.86%	3.55%	+1.31%

Volatility

ENZL vs. FLAU - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU) at 3.99%. This indicates that ENZL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ENZL	FLAU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.52%	3.99%	+0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.69%	14.45%	-0.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.92%	16.95%	-1.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.63%	19.65%	-1.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.38%	23.51%	-3.13%

ENZL vs. FLAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENZL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FLAU's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

ENZL vs. FLAU - Dividend Comparison

ENZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than FLAU's 3.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENZL iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF	2.19%	2.23%	2.13%	3.00%	1.62%	2.46%	1.66%	3.35%	3.60%	3.69%	4.79%	4.29%
FLAU Franklin FTSE Australia ETF	3.13%	3.25%	3.37%	3.62%	5.91%	5.14%	2.18%	4.37%	4.34%	0.18%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ENZL and FLAU in my portfolio?

ENZL and FLAU have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ENZL or FLAU?

ENZL has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to FLAU (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENZL dropped -42.44% vs FLAU's -45.73%.

Which ETF is better, ENZL or FLAU?

On 5-year performance, FLAU leads with 6.97% vs -3.33% for ENZL. On fees, FLAU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLAU has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ENZL or FLAU?

Over the 5-year period, FLAU has performed better with a 6.97% return vs -3.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ENZL or FLAU?

FLAU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for ENZL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ENZL or FLAU?

FLAU has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 2.19% for ENZL.

What is the main difference between ENZL and FLAU?

ENZL is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while FLAU is Australia Equities. ENZL tracks MSCI New Zealand Investable Market Index, while FLAU tracks FTSE Australia RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ENZL and 0.09% for FLAU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.