FLAU vs. JEPI
FLAU (Franklin FTSE Australia ETF) and JEPI (JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLAU is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE Australia RIC Capped Index, while JEPI is a Dividend fund actively managed by JPMorgan. FLAU is passively managed, while JEPI is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLAU returned 5.94%/yr vs 7.37%/yr for JEPI. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLAU charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPI.
Performance
FLAU vs. JEPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLAU achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly higher than JEPI's 0.69% return.
FLAU
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 10.26%
- 6M
- 11.87%
- 1Y
- 15.17%
- 3Y*
- 13.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.94%
- 10Y*
- —
JEPI
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- YTD
- 0.69%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 8.25%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 7.37%
- 10Y*
- —
FLAU vs. JEPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLAU Franklin FTSE Australia ETF | 10.26% | 15.95% | 1.81% | 12.58% | -5.58% | 9.90% | 42.39% |
JEPI JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF | 0.69% | 8.09% | 12.57% | 9.83% | -3.49% | 21.52% | 18.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLAU and JEPI is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2020 | 0.61 |
The correlation between FLAU and JEPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLAU vs. JEPI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLAU
JEPI
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Industrials
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
Utilities
Financial Services
FLAU
JEPI
Basic Materials
FLAU
JEPI
Consumer Cyclical
FLAU
JEPI
Real Estate
FLAU
JEPI
Industrials
FLAU
JEPI
Energy
FLAU
JEPI
Healthcare
FLAU
JEPI
Consumer Defensive
FLAU
JEPI
Communication Services
FLAU
JEPI
Technology
FLAU
JEPI
Utilities
FLAU
JEPI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLAU vs. JEPI — Risk / Return Rank
FLAU
JEPI
FLAU vs. JEPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU) and JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLAU | JEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.19 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 1.24 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.69 | 3.96 | +0.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLAU | JEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 1.05 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.67 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 1.02 | -0.69 |
Drawdowns
FLAU vs. JEPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLAU drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, which is greater than JEPI's maximum drawdown of -13.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAU and JEPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLAU | JEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.73% | -13.71% | -32.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.01% | -6.68% | -3.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.03% | -13.26% | -8.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.68% | -13.71% | -10.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.30% | -4.31% | +1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.79% | -2.12% | -4.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.24% | 2.08% | +1.16% |
Volatility
FLAU vs. JEPI - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI) at 1.46%. This indicates that FLAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLAU | JEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 1.46% | +3.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.65% | 6.10% | +7.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.63% | 7.87% | +8.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.60% | 11.06% | +8.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.58% | 10.80% | +12.78% |
FLAU vs. JEPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLAU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than JEPI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLAU vs. JEPI - Dividend Comparison
FLAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, less than JEPI's 8.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLAU Franklin FTSE Australia ETF | 2.95% | 3.25% | 3.37% | 3.62% | 5.91% | 5.14% | 2.18% | 4.37% | 4.34% | 0.18% |
JEPI JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF | 8.23% | 8.25% | 7.33% | 8.40% | 11.68% | 6.59% | 5.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLAU and JEPI have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLAU has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to JEPI (1.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLAU dropped -45.73% vs JEPI's -13.71%.
On 5-year performance, JEPI leads with 7.37% vs 5.94% for FLAU. On fees, FLAU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, JEPI has been the lower-risk option at 1.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JEPI has performed better with a 7.37% return vs 5.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLAU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEPI.
JEPI has the higher dividend yield at 8.23%, compared with 2.95% for FLAU.
FLAU is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while JEPI is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLAU and 0.35% for JEPI.
JEPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLAU and JEPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer