PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLAU vs. EPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLAU vs. EPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU) and WisdomTree India Earnings Fund (EPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLAU achieves a 10.47% return, which is significantly higher than EPI's -10.02% return.


FLAU

1D
-1.17%
1M
1.12%
YTD
10.47%
6M
12.59%
1Y
16.61%
3Y*
12.97%
5Y*
5.98%
10Y*

EPI

1D
-1.40%
1M
-2.71%
YTD
-10.02%
6M
-8.12%
1Y
-9.55%
3Y*
7.59%
5Y*
5.37%
10Y*
8.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLAU vs. EPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLAU
Franklin FTSE Australia ETF
10.47%15.95%1.81%12.58%-5.58%9.90%11.00%23.38%-10.17%1.89%
EPI
WisdomTree India Earnings Fund
-10.02%2.25%10.70%26.03%-4.74%26.41%18.55%1.53%-9.88%1.93%

Correlation

The correlation between FLAU and EPI is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.48

The correlation between FLAU and EPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLAU vs. EPI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLAU
EPI

Financial Services

36.0%
23.4%

Basic Materials

26.2%
13.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
7.5%

Real Estate

6.4%
0.9%

Industrials

6.4%
9.7%

Energy

5.7%
17.3%

Healthcare

4.9%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
3.5%

Communication Services

1.7%
2.0%

Technology

1.2%
8.3%

Utilities

0.8%
8.4%

Financial Services

FLAU
36.0%
EPI
23.4%

Basic Materials

FLAU
26.2%
EPI
13.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FLAU
6.6%
EPI
7.5%

Real Estate

FLAU
6.4%
EPI
0.9%

Industrials

FLAU
6.4%
EPI
9.7%

Energy

FLAU
5.7%
EPI
17.3%

Healthcare

FLAU
4.9%
EPI
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

FLAU
3.7%
EPI
3.5%

Communication Services

FLAU
1.7%
EPI
2.0%

Technology

FLAU
1.2%
EPI
8.3%

Utilities

FLAU
0.8%
EPI
8.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLAU vs. EPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLAU
FLAU Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FLAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLAU Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FLAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLAU Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

EPI
EPI Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
EPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPI Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
EPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPI Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLAU vs. EPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU) and WisdomTree India Earnings Fund (EPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLAUEPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.90

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

-0.57

+2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.15

-1.39

+6.54

FLAU vs. EPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLAU Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is higher than the EPI Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLAU and EPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLAUEPIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

-0.64

+1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.33

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.13

+0.20

Drawdowns

FLAU vs. EPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLAU drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, smaller than the maximum EPI drawdown of -66.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAU and EPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLAUEPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.73%

-66.21%

+20.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.01%

-16.88%

+6.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.03%

-21.89%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.68%

-21.89%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.11%

-17.83%

+14.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.79%

-18.65%

+11.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

6.87%

-3.64%

Volatility

FLAU vs. EPI - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to WisdomTree India Earnings Fund (EPI) at 4.86%. This indicates that FLAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLAUEPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.45%

4.86%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.66%

12.80%

+0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.63%

14.94%

+1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.61%

16.21%

+3.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.58%

20.35%

+3.23%

FLAU vs. EPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLAU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EPI's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLAU vs. EPI - Dividend Comparison

FLAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, while EPI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPI
WisdomTree India Earnings Fund
0.00%0.00%0.27%0.15%6.01%1.18%0.78%1.17%1.18%0.85%1.05%1.20%
FLAU
Franklin FTSE Australia ETF
2.94%3.25%3.37%3.62%5.91%5.14%2.18%4.37%4.34%0.18%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLAU and EPI have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLAU has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to EPI (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLAU dropped -45.73% vs EPI's -66.21%.

On 5-year performance, FLAU leads with 5.98% vs 5.37% for EPI. On fees, FLAU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EPI has been the lower-risk option at 4.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLAU has performed better with a 5.98% return vs 5.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLAU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for EPI.

FLAU has the higher dividend yield at 2.94%, compared with 0.00% for EPI.

FLAU tracks FTSE Australia RIC Capped Index, while EPI tracks WisdomTree India Earnings Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLAU and 0.84% for EPI.

FLAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLAU and EPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer