FLAU vs. BCD
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD).
FLAU and BCD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLAU is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Australia RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. BCD is an actively managed fund by Abrdn Plc. It was launched on Mar 30, 2017.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLAU or BCD.
Correlation
The correlation between FLAU and BCD is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FLAU vs. BCD - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FLAU:
0.31
BCD:
0.34
FLAU:
0.59
BCD:
0.55
FLAU:
1.08
BCD:
1.07
FLAU:
0.30
BCD:
0.21
FLAU:
0.99
BCD:
0.84
FLAU:
6.68%
BCD:
5.13%
FLAU:
21.55%
BCD:
12.81%
FLAU:
-45.73%
BCD:
-29.79%
FLAU:
-8.05%
BCD:
-11.17%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLAU achieves a 3.19% return, which is significantly lower than BCD's 5.08% return.
FLAU
3.19%
3.38%
-3.46%
7.98%
13.33%
N/A
BCD
5.08%
-2.37%
4.17%
3.98%
16.18%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLAU vs. BCD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLAU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than BCD's 0.29% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLAU vs. BCD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FLAU
BCD
FLAU vs. BCD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLAU vs. BCD - Dividend Comparison
FLAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, less than BCD's 3.43% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLAU Franklin FTSE Australia ETF | 3.26% | 3.37% | 3.62% | 5.91% | 5.14% | 2.18% | 4.37% | 4.35% | 0.18% |
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 3.43% | 3.60% | 4.51% | 5.21% | 8.30% | 1.29% | 1.56% | 1.59% | 0.07% |
Drawdowns
FLAU vs. BCD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLAU drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, which is greater than BCD's maximum drawdown of -29.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAU and BCD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLAU vs. BCD - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU) has a higher volatility of 14.42% compared to abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) at 7.17%. This indicates that FLAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.