FLAU vs. BCD
FLAU (Franklin FTSE Australia ETF) and BCD (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLAU is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE Australia RIC Capped Index, while BCD is a Commodities fund actively managed by Aberdeen. FLAU is passively managed, while BCD is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLAU returned 5.98%/yr vs 11.98%/yr for BCD. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLAU charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for BCD.
Performance
FLAU vs. BCD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLAU achieves a 10.47% return, which is significantly lower than BCD's 20.45% return.
FLAU
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 10.47%
- 6M
- 12.59%
- 1Y
- 16.61%
- 3Y*
- 12.97%
- 5Y*
- 5.98%
- 10Y*
- —
BCD
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- YTD
- 20.45%
- 6M
- 20.51%
- 1Y
- 31.80%
- 3Y*
- 14.44%
- 5Y*
- 11.98%
- 10Y*
- —
FLAU vs. BCD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLAU Franklin FTSE Australia ETF | 10.47% | 15.95% | 1.81% | 12.58% | -5.58% | 9.90% | 11.00% | 23.38% | -10.17% | 1.89% |
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 20.45% | 15.71% | 6.20% | -7.58% | 18.38% | 31.87% | 4.76% | 7.34% | -8.65% | -0.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLAU and BCD is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.37 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FLAU and BCD has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLAU vs. BCD — Risk / Return Rank
FLAU
BCD
FLAU vs. BCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLAU | BCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.43 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 4.42 | -2.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.15 | 12.57 | -7.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLAU | BCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 2.33 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.78 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.67 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
FLAU vs. BCD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLAU drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, which is greater than BCD's maximum drawdown of -29.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLAU and BCD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLAU | BCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.73% | -29.81% | -15.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.01% | -7.22% | -2.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.03% | -10.50% | -11.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.68% | -23.03% | -1.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.11% | -3.60% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.79% | -9.86% | +3.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 2.54% | +0.69% |
Volatility
FLAU vs. BCD - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) at 4.33%. This indicates that FLAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLAU | BCD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.45% | 4.33% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.66% | 11.74% | +1.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.63% | 13.72% | +2.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.61% | 15.41% | +4.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.58% | 13.90% | +9.68% |
FLAU vs. BCD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLAU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than BCD's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLAU vs. BCD - Dividend Comparison
FLAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, less than BCD's 14.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCD abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 14.29% | 17.21% | 3.60% | 4.51% | 5.21% | 8.30% | 1.29% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 0.07% |
FLAU Franklin FTSE Australia ETF | 2.94% | 3.25% | 3.37% | 3.62% | 5.91% | 5.14% | 2.18% | 4.37% | 4.34% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLAU and BCD have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLAU has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to BCD (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLAU dropped -45.73% vs BCD's -29.81%.
On 5-year performance, BCD leads with 11.98% vs 5.98% for FLAU. On fees, FLAU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, BCD has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BCD has performed better with a 11.98% return vs 5.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLAU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for BCD.
BCD has the higher dividend yield at 14.29%, compared with 2.94% for FLAU.
FLAU is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while BCD is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLAU and 0.29% for BCD.
BCD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLAU and BCD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer