ENHU vs. SPTM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ENHU (iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. ENHU is actively managed, while SPTM is passively managed. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ENHU charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.

Performance

ENHU vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF (ENHU) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ENHU having a 10.96% return and SPTM slightly higher at 11.10%.

ENHU

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 4.83%
• YTD: 10.96%
• 6M: 11.23%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPTM

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 4.87%
• YTD: 11.10%
• 6M: 11.13%
• 1Y: 27.84%
• 3Y*: 21.90%
• 5Y*: 13.38%
• 10Y*: 15.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENHU vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ENHU iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF	10.96%	1.32%
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	11.10%	1.07%

Correlation

The correlation between ENHU and SPTM is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025	0.99

Return for Risk

ENHU vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPTM

SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 70
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 69
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENHU vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF (ENHU) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ENHU	SPTM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.74	0.46	+1.28

Drawdowns

ENHU vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENHU drawdown since its inception was -8.98%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENHU and SPTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENHU	SPTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.98%	-54.80%	+45.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.68%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.87%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.14%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.62%	-0.67%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.49%	-9.05%	+7.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.86%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ENHU	SPTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.88%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.92%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.21%	11.88%	+1.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.21%	16.87%	-3.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.21%	18.03%	-4.82%

ENHU vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENHU has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ENHU vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison

ENHU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than SPTM's 1.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENHU iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF	0.34%	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	1.04%	1.13%	1.28%	1.44%	1.69%	1.25%	1.56%	1.72%	1.90%	1.66%	1.91%	1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ENHU and SPTM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, ENHU and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, ENHU or SPTM?

On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ENHU or SPTM?

SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for ENHU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ENHU or SPTM?

SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.34% for ENHU.

What is the main difference between ENHU and SPTM?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for ENHU and 0.03% for SPTM.