ENHU vs. DGRO
ENHU (iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ENHU is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. ENHU is actively managed, while DGRO is passively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ENHU charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
ENHU vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENHU achieves a 10.91% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 12.23% return.
ENHU
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 8.67%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- YTD
- 12.23%
- 1Y
- 21.63%
- 3Y*
- 16.92%
- 5Y*
- 11.06%
- 10Y*
- 13.26%
ENHU vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ENHU iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF | 10.91% | 1.32% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 12.23% | 3.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENHU and DGRO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENHU vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
ENHU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DGRO
ENHU vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF (ENHU) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENHU | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.42 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.36 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.98 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENHU vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENHU drawdown since its inception was -8.98%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENHU and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENHU | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.98% | -35.10% | +26.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -0.50% | -0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.49% | -3.42% | +1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.67% | — |
Volatility
ENHU vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENHU | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.62% | 9.50% | +4.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.62% | 13.79% | -0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.62% | 16.57% | -2.95% |
ENHU vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENHU has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ENHU vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
ENHU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than DGRO's 1.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.91% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
ENHU iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF | 0.50% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENHU and DGRO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for ENHU.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.50% for ENHU.
ENHU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for ENHU and 0.08% for DGRO.
Find the right allocation for ENHU and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer