ENHU vs. BDGS
ENHU (iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ENHU charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for BDGS.
Performance
ENHU vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENHU achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 5.64% return.
ENHU
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- 10.96%
- 6M
- 11.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BDGS
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 5.64%
- 6M
- 5.65%
- 1Y
- 13.85%
- 3Y*
- 14.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENHU vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ENHU iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF | 10.96% | 1.32% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 5.64% | -0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENHU and BDGS is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENHU vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank
ENHU
BDGS
ENHU vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF (ENHU) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENHU | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.74 | 1.76 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
ENHU vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENHU drawdown since its inception was -8.98%, roughly equal to the maximum BDGS drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENHU and BDGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENHU | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.98% | -9.12% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -0.83% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.49% | -0.64% | -0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.84% | — |
Volatility
ENHU vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENHU | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.21% | 6.08% | +7.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.21% | 8.21% | +5.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.21% | 8.21% | +5.00% |
ENHU vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENHU has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENHU vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison
ENHU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than BDGS's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 0.52% | 0.55% | 1.81% | 0.84% |
ENHU iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF | 0.34% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENHU and BDGS have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ENHU is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ENHU is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BDGS.
BDGS has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.34% for ENHU.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for ENHU and 0.85% for BDGS.
Find the right allocation for ENHU and BDGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer