ENHU vs. ACWI
ENHU (iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ENHU is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. ENHU is actively managed, while ACWI is passively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ENHU charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.
Performance
ENHU vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENHU achieves a 8.83% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 9.86% return.
ENHU
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- YTD
- 8.83%
- 6M
- 7.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACWI
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- YTD
- 9.86%
- 6M
- 9.11%
- 1Y
- 25.60%
- 3Y*
- 20.00%
- 5Y*
- 10.74%
- 10Y*
- 13.09%
ENHU vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ENHU iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF | 8.83% | 1.32% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 9.86% | 2.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENHU and ACWI is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENHU vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank
ENHU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ACWI
ENHU vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF (ENHU) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENHU | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.64 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.51 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENHU vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENHU drawdown since its inception was -8.98%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENHU and ACWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENHU | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.98% | -56.00% | +47.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.53% | -2.83% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.51% | -8.59% | +7.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.23% | — |
Volatility
ENHU vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENHU | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.38% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.92% | 13.64% | +0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 16.20% | -2.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 17.08% | -3.16% |
ENHU vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENHU has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENHU vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
ENHU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than ACWI's 1.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.45% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
ENHU iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF | 0.51% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, ENHU and ACWI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ENHU is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ENHU is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.
ACWI has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.51% for ENHU.
ENHU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for ENHU and 0.32% for ACWI.
Find the right allocation for ENHU and ACWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer