ENFR vs. PWRZ
ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) and PWRZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. ENFR is passively managed, while PWRZ is actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ENFR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PWRZ.
Performance
ENFR vs. PWRZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ENFR
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 5.43%
- 6M
- 27.82%
- YTD
- 29.35%
- 1Y
- 32.20%
- 3Y*
- 28.32%
- 5Y*
- 22.31%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
PWRZ
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENFR vs. PWRZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 1.81% |
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF | -0.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENFR and PWRZ is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENFR vs. PWRZ — Risk / Return Rank
ENFR
PWRZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ENFR vs. PWRZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENFR | PWRZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.74 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.20 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENFR vs. PWRZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENFR drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, which is greater than PWRZ's maximum drawdown of -1.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENFR and PWRZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENFR | PWRZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.28% | -1.21% | -67.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -1.21% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.88% | -0.42% | -15.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | — | — |
Volatility
ENFR vs. PWRZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENFR | PWRZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.07% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.20% | 12.75% | +2.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.27% | 12.75% | +6.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.65% | 12.75% | +11.90% |
ENFR vs. PWRZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENFR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PWRZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENFR vs. PWRZ - Dividend Comparison
ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, while PWRZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 3.88% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENFR and PWRZ have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRZ.
ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.88%, compared with 0.00% for PWRZ.
They also come from different issuers: SS&C and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ENFR and 0.75% for PWRZ.
Find the right allocation for ENFR and PWRZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer