PWRZ vs. GXPE
PWRZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF) and GXPE (Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. PWRZ is actively managed, while GXPE is passively managed. PWRZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPE.
Performance
PWRZ vs. GXPE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PWRZ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXPE
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -3.84%
- 6M
- 18.56%
- YTD
- 23.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PWRZ vs. GXPE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.00% |
GXPE Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF | -1.45% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWRZ vs. GXPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ) and Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWRZ vs. GXPE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWRZ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum GXPE drawdown of -15.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWRZ and GXPE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWRZ | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -15.73% | +15.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -12.61% | +12.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -4.09% | +4.09% |
Volatility
PWRZ vs. GXPE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWRZ | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 20.70% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 20.70% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 20.70% | — |
PWRZ vs. GXPE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWRZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWRZ vs. GXPE - Dividend Comparison
PWRZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GXPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GXPE Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF | 2.26% | 1.20% |
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, GXPE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRZ.
GXPE has the higher dividend yield at 2.26%, compared with 0.00% for PWRZ.
They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PWRZ and 0.15% for GXPE.
Find the right allocation for PWRZ and GXPE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer