PWRZ vs. FPA

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

PWRZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF) and FPA (First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - PWRZ is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by TrueShares, while FPA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Asia Pacific Ex-Japan Index. PWRZ is actively managed, while FPA is passively managed. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. PWRZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FPA.

Performance

PWRZ vs. FPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ) and First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PWRZ

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FPA

• 1D: -5.43%
• 1M: -14.07%
• 6M: 18.65%
• YTD: 26.33%
• 1Y: 35.45%
• 3Y*: 22.92%
• 5Y*: 9.93%
• 10Y*: 8.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWRZ vs. FPA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF	-0.40%
FPA First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund	-4.43%

Correlation

The correlation between PWRZ and FPA is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026	-1.00

Return for Risk

PWRZ vs. FPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWRZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FPA

FPA Risk / Return Rank: 45
FPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
FPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
FPA Omega Ratio Rank: 46
FPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
FPA Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWRZ vs. FPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ) and First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund (FPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PWRZ	FPA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.22	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.72	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.24	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.78	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.60	—

Drawdowns

PWRZ vs. FPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWRZ drawdown since its inception was -0.40%, smaller than the maximum FPA drawdown of -52.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWRZ and FPA.

Drawdown Indicators

	PWRZ	FPA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.40%	-52.91%	+52.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-20.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.66%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.59%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-52.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.40%	-20.03%	+19.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.31%	-13.46%	+13.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.39%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PWRZ	FPA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	13.83%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	27.20%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62%	29.33%	-28.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.62%	25.01%	-24.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.62%	22.83%	-22.21%

PWRZ vs. FPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWRZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FPA's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

PWRZ vs. FPA - Dividend Comparison

PWRZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FPA First Trust Asia Pacific ex-Japan AlphaDEX Fund	3.84%	4.71%	3.40%	3.02%	4.22%	5.12%	1.59%	3.90%	2.81%	3.15%	2.42%	1.74%
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PWRZ and FPA in my portfolio?

PWRZ and FPA have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PWRZ or FPA?

On fees, PWRZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PWRZ or FPA?

PWRZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FPA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PWRZ or FPA?

FPA has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 0.00% for PWRZ.

What is the main difference between PWRZ and FPA?

PWRZ is categorized as Energy Equities, while FPA is Asia Pacific Equities. They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PWRZ and 0.80% for FPA.