PWRZ vs. EMDM
PWRZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF) and EMDM (First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PWRZ is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by TrueShares, while EMDM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies Index - Benchmark TR Net. PWRZ is actively managed, while EMDM is passively managed. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
PWRZ vs. EMDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PWRZ
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMDM
- 1D
- -3.88%
- 1M
- -4.91%
- 6M
- 21.93%
- YTD
- 29.59%
- 1Y
- 67.41%
- 3Y*
- 27.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PWRZ vs. EMDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF | -0.40% |
EMDM First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF | -3.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWRZ and EMDM is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026 | -1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWRZ vs. EMDM — Risk / Return Rank
PWRZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EMDM
PWRZ vs. EMDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ) and First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PWRZ | EMDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.44 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.33 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.24 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWRZ vs. EMDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWRZ drawdown since its inception was -0.40%, smaller than the maximum EMDM drawdown of -18.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWRZ and EMDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWRZ | EMDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.40% | -18.81% | +18.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -9.68% | +9.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.31% | -4.09% | +3.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.16% | — |
Volatility
PWRZ vs. EMDM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWRZ | EMDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62% | 27.02% | -26.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.62% | 20.93% | -20.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.62% | 20.93% | -20.31% |
PWRZ vs. EMDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PWRZ and EMDM have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
PWRZ vs. EMDM - Dividend Comparison
PWRZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EMDM First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF | 2.92% | 3.57% | 5.87% | 2.16% |
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWRZ and EMDM have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PWRZ and EMDM have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
EMDM has the higher dividend yield at 2.92%, compared with 0.00% for PWRZ.
PWRZ is categorized as Energy Equities, while EMDM is Emerging Markets Diversified. They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and First Trust.
Find the right allocation for PWRZ and EMDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer