ENDW vs. NTSI
ENDW (Cambria Endowment Style ETF) and NTSI (WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ENDW returned 27.79% vs 20.90% for NTSI. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ENDW charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for NTSI.
Performance
ENDW vs. NTSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENDW achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly higher than NTSI's 7.18% return.
ENDW
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 10.76%
- 6M
- 11.08%
- 1Y
- 27.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSI
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 3.92%
- YTD
- 7.18%
- 6M
- 8.77%
- 1Y
- 20.90%
- 3Y*
- 14.26%
- 5Y*
- 5.55%
- 10Y*
- —
ENDW vs. NTSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ENDW Cambria Endowment Style ETF | 10.76% | 30.77% |
NTSI WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund | 7.18% | 28.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENDW and NTSI is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2025 | 0.77 |
The correlation between ENDW and NTSI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
ENDW vs. NTSI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ENDW
NTSI
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
ENDW
NTSI
Technology
ENDW
NTSI
Industrials
ENDW
NTSI
Energy
ENDW
NTSI
Consumer Cyclical
ENDW
NTSI
Real Estate
ENDW
NTSI
Basic Materials
ENDW
NTSI
Communication Services
ENDW
NTSI
Healthcare
ENDW
NTSI
Consumer Defensive
ENDW
NTSI
Utilities
ENDW
NTSI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENDW vs. NTSI — Risk / Return Rank
ENDW
NTSI
ENDW vs. NTSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Endowment Style ETF (ENDW) and WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENDW | NTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.25 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.34 | 1.70 | +2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.69 | 6.22 | +11.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENDW | NTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.76 | 1.41 | +1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.50 | 0.38 | +3.12 |
Drawdowns
ENDW vs. NTSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENDW drawdown since its inception was -6.44%, smaller than the maximum NTSI drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENDW and NTSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENDW | NTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.44% | -34.01% | +27.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.44% | -12.33% | +5.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -2.36% | +1.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.81% | -9.19% | +8.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.57% | 3.37% | -1.80% |
Volatility
ENDW vs. NTSI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cambria Endowment Style ETF (ENDW) is 2.78%, while WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that ENDW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENDW | NTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.78% | 4.84% | -2.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.62% | 12.60% | -4.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.13% | 14.95% | -4.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.00% | 15.68% | -4.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.00% | 15.63% | -4.63% |
ENDW vs. NTSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENDW has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSI's 0.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENDW vs. NTSI - Dividend Comparison
ENDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, less than NTSI's 3.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENDW Cambria Endowment Style ETF | 2.18% | 1.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NTSI WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund | 3.51% | 3.65% | 2.92% | 2.35% | 2.66% | 0.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENDW and NTSI have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NTSI has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to ENDW (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENDW dropped -6.44% vs NTSI's -34.01%.
On 1-year performance, ENDW leads with 27.79% vs 20.90% for NTSI. On fees, NTSI is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, ENDW has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ENDW has performed better with a 27.79% return vs 20.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NTSI is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for ENDW.
NTSI has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 2.18% for ENDW.
They also come from different issuers: Cambria and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for ENDW and 0.26% for NTSI.
ENDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENDW and NTSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer