ENDW vs. DYTA
Compare and contrast key facts about Cambria Endowment Style ETF (ENDW) and SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF (DYTA).
ENDW and DYTA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ENDW is an actively managed fund by Cambria. It was launched on Apr 9, 2025. DYTA is an actively managed fund by Summit Global Investments. It was launched on Mar 29, 2023.
Performance
ENDW vs. DYTA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ENDW vs. DYTA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ENDW Cambria Endowment Style ETF | 3.42% | 30.77% |
DYTA SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF | -4.29% | 10.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENDW achieves a 3.42% return, which is significantly higher than DYTA's -4.29% return.
ENDW
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- -4.20%
- YTD
- 3.42%
- 6M
- 7.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DYTA
- 1D
- 3.05%
- 1M
- -5.52%
- YTD
- -4.29%
- 6M
- -2.16%
- 1Y
- 2.73%
- 3Y*
- 7.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ENDW vs. DYTA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENDW has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DYTA's 1.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ENDW vs. DYTA — Risk / Return Rank
ENDW
DYTA
ENDW vs. DYTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Endowment Style ETF (ENDW) and SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF (DYTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENDW | DYTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.24 | 0.75 | +2.49 |
Correlation
The correlation between ENDW and DYTA is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ENDW vs. DYTA - Dividend Comparison
ENDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than DYTA's 1.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ENDW Cambria Endowment Style ETF | 2.34% | 1.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DYTA SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF | 1.71% | 1.64% | 10.80% | 0.89% |
Drawdowns
ENDW vs. DYTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENDW drawdown since its inception was -6.44%, smaller than the maximum DYTA drawdown of -9.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENDW and DYTA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENDW | DYTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.44% | -9.41% | +2.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.36% | -6.57% | +2.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.82% | -2.28% | +1.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.81% | — |
Volatility
ENDW vs. DYTA - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ENDW | DYTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.36% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.36% | 9.88% | +1.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.36% | 10.87% | +0.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.36% | 10.87% | +0.49% |