EMR vs. XLC
EMR (Emerson Electric Co.) is a stock, while XLC (Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund) is Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index. Over the past 5 years, EMR returned 10.27%/yr vs 8.03%/yr for XLC. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EMR vs. XLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMR achieves a 8.65% return, which is significantly higher than XLC's -4.85% return.
EMR
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- YTD
- 8.65%
- 6M
- 5.53%
- 1Y
- 15.82%
- 3Y*
- 20.61%
- 5Y*
- 10.27%
- 10Y*
- 13.44%
XLC
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -4.66%
- YTD
- -4.85%
- 6M
- -3.59%
- 1Y
- 10.19%
- 3Y*
- 21.60%
- 5Y*
- 8.03%
- 10Y*
- —
EMR vs. XLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMR Emerson Electric Co. | 8.65% | 8.92% | 29.73% | 3.75% | 5.74% | 18.19% | 8.61% | 31.53% | -16.01% |
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | -4.85% | 23.08% | 34.71% | 52.82% | -37.63% | 15.96% | 26.90% | 31.05% | -16.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMR and XLC is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018 | 0.49 |
The correlation between EMR and XLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMR vs. XLC — Risk / Return Rank
EMR
XLC
EMR vs. XLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMR | XLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.12 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 0.86 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.37 | 2.73 | -1.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMR vs. XLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMR drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, which is greater than XLC's maximum drawdown of -46.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMR and XLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMR | XLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.05% | -46.65% | -12.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.45% | -10.57% | -12.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.62% | -17.97% | -11.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.62% | -46.65% | +17.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.82% | -6.72% | -4.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.11% | -10.58% | -3.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.79% | 3.33% | +7.46% |
Volatility
EMR vs. XLC - Volatility Comparison
Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) has a higher volatility of 9.08% compared to Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) at 3.57%. This indicates that EMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMR | XLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.08% | 3.57% | +5.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.24% | 9.65% | +15.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.47% | 13.28% | +17.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.36% | 20.68% | +6.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.14% | 22.17% | +6.97% |
Dividends
EMR vs. XLC - Dividend Comparison
EMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than XLC's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMR Emerson Electric Co. | 1.53% | 1.61% | 1.70% | 2.14% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 2.49% | 2.58% | 3.26% | 2.76% | 3.42% | 3.94% |
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.25% | 1.13% | 0.99% | 0.82% | 1.10% | 0.74% | 0.68% | 0.82% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMR and XLC have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMR has higher volatility (9.08%) compared to XLC (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMR dropped -59.05% vs XLC's -46.65%.
XLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMR and XLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer