EMQQ vs. KEMQ
EMQQ (EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF) and KEMQ (KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EMQQ tracks the EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index while KEMQ tracks the Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMQQ returned -12.41%/yr vs -4.14%/yr for KEMQ. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMQQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for KEMQ.
Performance
EMQQ vs. KEMQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMQQ achieves a -24.03% return, which is significantly lower than KEMQ's 2.13% return.
EMQQ
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- -24.03%
- 6M
- -23.90%
- 1Y
- -21.65%
- 3Y*
- 3.56%
- 5Y*
- -12.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.32%
KEMQ
- 1D
- -3.77%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- 2.13%
- 6M
- 2.85%
- 1Y
- 21.94%
- 3Y*
- 22.94%
- 5Y*
- -4.14%
- 10Y*
- —
EMQQ vs. KEMQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | -24.03% | 20.66% | 13.79% | 4.48% | -30.70% | -32.53% | 80.45% | 33.86% | -29.82% | 2.61% |
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF | 2.13% | 56.28% | 13.81% | 0.77% | -38.09% | -27.31% | 39.26% | 28.26% | -25.52% | 1.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMQQ and KEMQ is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2017 | 0.92 |
The correlation between EMQQ and KEMQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMQQ vs. KEMQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMQQ
KEMQ
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
EMQQ
KEMQ
Technology
EMQQ
KEMQ
Communication Services
EMQQ
KEMQ
Financial Services
EMQQ
KEMQ
Real Estate
EMQQ
KEMQ
-
Utilities
EMQQ
KEMQ
-
Industrials
EMQQ
KEMQ
Consumer Defensive
EMQQ
KEMQ
Healthcare
EMQQ
KEMQ
Basic Materials
EMQQ
-
KEMQ
-
Energy
EMQQ
-
KEMQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMQQ vs. KEMQ — Risk / Return Rank
EMQQ
KEMQ
EMQQ vs. KEMQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMQQ | KEMQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.16 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 1.00 | -1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | 2.59 | -3.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMQQ vs. KEMQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.24%, roughly equal to the maximum KEMQ drawdown of -70.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ and KEMQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMQQ | KEMQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.24% | -70.72% | -2.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.55% | -21.94% | -10.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.55% | -21.94% | -10.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.31% | -66.02% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.98% | -31.41% | -28.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.47% | -35.64% | +4.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.56% | 8.49% | +8.07% |
Volatility
EMQQ vs. KEMQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) is 5.99%, while KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) has a volatility of 11.75%. This indicates that EMQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMQQ | KEMQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.99% | 11.75% | -5.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.76% | 22.87% | -6.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.77% | 27.40% | -6.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.14% | 32.15% | +0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.61% | 29.67% | +0.94% |
EMQQ vs. KEMQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMQ's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMQQ vs. KEMQ - Dividend Comparison
EMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, less than KEMQ's 5.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF | 4.07% | 3.09% | 1.70% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.75% | 0.08% |
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF | 5.16% | 5.27% | 0.73% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 2.28% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMQQ and KEMQ have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KEMQ has higher volatility (11.75%) compared to EMQQ (5.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMQQ dropped -73.24% vs KEMQ's -70.72%.
On 5-year performance, KEMQ leads with -4.14% vs -12.41% for EMQQ. On fees, KEMQ is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, EMQQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, KEMQ has performed better with a -4.14% return vs -12.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KEMQ is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMQQ.
KEMQ has the higher dividend yield at 5.16%, compared with 4.07% for EMQQ.
EMQQ tracks EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index, while KEMQ tracks Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMQQ and 0.60% for KEMQ.
KEMQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMQQ and KEMQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer