PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMQQ vs. JPEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMQQ vs. JPEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JPEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMQQ achieves a -14.82% return, which is significantly lower than JPEM's 8.42% return. Over the past 10 years, EMQQ has underperformed JPEM with an annualized return of 4.76%, while JPEM has yielded a comparatively higher 7.21% annualized return.


EMQQ

1D
1.06%
1M
7.64%
6M
-13.01%
YTD
-14.82%
1Y
-12.02%
3Y*
3.09%
5Y*
-7.26%
10Y*
4.76%
ALL TIME*
3.07%

JPEM

1D
-0.09%
1M
3.23%
6M
1.88%
YTD
8.42%
1Y
20.19%
3Y*
12.56%
5Y*
7.18%
10Y*
7.21%
ALL TIME*
5.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.08M$1.15M$1.71M
$760.96K$794.41K$1.08M

EMQQ vs. JPEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMQQ
EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF
-14.82%20.66%13.79%4.48%-30.70%-32.53%80.45%33.86%-29.82%68.20%
JPEM
J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF
8.42%22.90%4.23%11.01%-9.03%8.11%-0.46%16.21%-10.55%28.80%

Correlation

The correlation between EMQQ and JPEM is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2015

0.69

The correlation between EMQQ and JPEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMQQ vs. JPEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMQQ
JPEM

Consumer Cyclical

33.1%
10.6%

Technology

7.5%
6.2%

Communication Services

6.9%
8.2%

Financial Services

3.6%
20.2%

Real Estate

2.7%
2.2%

Industrials

1.1%
12.6%

Utilities

0.4%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

0.2%
8.6%

Healthcare

0.0%
3.9%

Basic Materials

-

12.0%

Energy

-

7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EMQQ
33.1%
JPEM
10.6%

Technology

EMQQ
7.5%
JPEM
6.2%

Communication Services

EMQQ
6.9%
JPEM
8.2%

Financial Services

EMQQ
3.6%
JPEM
20.2%

Real Estate

EMQQ
2.7%
JPEM
2.2%

Industrials

EMQQ
1.1%
JPEM
12.6%

Utilities

EMQQ
0.4%
JPEM
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

EMQQ
0.2%
JPEM
8.6%

Healthcare

EMQQ
0.0%
JPEM
3.9%

Basic Materials

EMQQ

-

JPEM
12.0%

Energy

EMQQ

-

JPEM
7.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMQQ vs. JPEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EMQQ
EMQQ Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
EMQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
EMQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

JPEM
JPEM Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
JPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
JPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EMQQ vs. JPEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMQQJPEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.28

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.39

1.99

-2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.70

6.48

-7.17

EMQQ vs. JPEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMQQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the JPEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMQQ and JPEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMQQ vs. JPEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.24%, which is greater than JPEM's maximum drawdown of -40.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ and JPEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMQQJPEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.24%

-40.22%

-33.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.70%

-10.32%

-23.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.70%

-14.30%

-19.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.70%

-21.57%

-40.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.24%

-40.22%

-33.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.12%

-1.97%

-53.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.71%

-9.39%

-22.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.96%

3.17%

+15.79%

Volatility

EMQQ vs. JPEM - Volatility Comparison

EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JPEM) at 3.77%. This indicates that EMQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMQQJPEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

3.77%

+1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.04%

12.18%

+4.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.16%

13.78%

+7.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.74%

13.58%

+19.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.58%

16.92%

+13.66%

EMQQ vs. JPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than JPEM's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMQQ vs. JPEM - Dividend Comparison

EMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, less than JPEM's 4.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMQQ
EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF
3.63%3.09%1.70%0.79%0.00%0.00%0.18%1.29%0.00%0.94%0.75%0.08%
JPEM
J.P. Morgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF
4.28%4.65%5.12%4.46%4.71%4.40%2.85%3.47%2.79%2.14%1.28%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMQQ and JPEM have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMQQ has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to JPEM (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMQQ dropped -73.24% vs JPEM's -40.22%.

On 10-year performance, JPEM leads with 7.21% vs 4.76% for EMQQ. On fees, JPEM is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, JPEM has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, JPEM has performed better with a 7.21% return vs 4.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPEM is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMQQ.

JPEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 3.63% for EMQQ.

EMQQ tracks EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index, while JPEM tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor Emerging Markets Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMQQ and 0.44% for JPEM.

JPEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMQQ and JPEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer