EMQQ vs. KWEB
Compare and contrast key facts about Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce ETF (EMQQ) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB).
EMQQ and KWEB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMQQ is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce Index. It was launched on Nov 13, 2014. KWEB is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the CSI Overseas China Internet. It was launched on Jul 31, 2013. Both EMQQ and KWEB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EMQQ or KWEB.
Key characteristics
| EMQQ | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 20.71% | 12.93% |
| 1Y Return | 23.70% | 11.68% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -11.06% | -13.81% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.51% | -6.30% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 3.90% | -0.86% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.16 | 0.36 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.75 | 0.83 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.21 | 1.10 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.41 | 0.19 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.71 | 1.13 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.52% | 12.45% |
| Daily Std Dev | 22.39% | 38.69% |
| Max Drawdown | -73.24% | -80.92% |
| Current Drawdown | -53.68% | -67.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMQQ and KWEB is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EMQQ vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EMQQ achieves a 20.71% return, which is significantly higher than KWEB's 12.93% return. Over the past 10 years, EMQQ has outperformed KWEB with an annualized return of 3.90%, while KWEB has yielded a comparatively lower -0.86% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMQQ vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than KWEB's 0.76% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EMQQ vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce ETF (EMQQ) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EMQQ vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison
EMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than KWEB's 1.51% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce ETF | 0.66% | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.94% | 0.75% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | 1.51% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 7.07% | 0.29% | 0.08% | 3.40% | 0.58% | 1.19% | 0.46% | 0.89% | 0.31% |
Drawdowns
EMQQ vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.24%, smaller than the maximum KWEB drawdown of -80.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ and KWEB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EMQQ vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce ETF (EMQQ) is 6.26%, while KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) has a volatility of 13.03%. This indicates that EMQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KWEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.