EMQQ vs. DBEM

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EMQQ (EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF) and DBEM (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EMQQ tracks the EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index while DBEM tracks the MSCI EM US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EMQQ returned 4.86%/yr vs 10.81%/yr for DBEM. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMQQ charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for DBEM.

Performance

EMQQ vs. DBEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMQQ achieves a -17.59% return, which is significantly lower than DBEM's 33.09% return. Over the past 10 years, EMQQ has underperformed DBEM with an annualized return of 4.86%, while DBEM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.81% annualized return.

EMQQ

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: -3.20%
• YTD: -17.59%
• 6M: -19.58%
• 1Y: -13.29%
• 3Y*: 6.20%
• 5Y*: -10.61%
• 10Y*: 4.86%

DBEM

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 11.14%
• YTD: 33.09%
• 6M: 35.55%
• 1Y: 65.81%
• 3Y*: 26.11%
• 5Y*: 10.06%
• 10Y*: 10.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMQQ vs. DBEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF	-17.59%	20.66%	13.79%	4.48%	-30.70%	-32.53%	80.45%	33.86%	-29.82%	68.20%
DBEM Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF	33.09%	30.42%	10.61%	10.53%	-17.00%	-2.26%	18.12%	16.77%	-10.81%	27.10%

Correlation

The correlation between EMQQ and DBEM is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2014	0.81

The correlation between EMQQ and DBEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMQQ vs. DBEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMQQ	DBEM
Consumer Cyclical	33.1%	9.6%
Technology	8.2%	36.4%
Communication Services	6.8%	7.0%
Financial Services	3.6%	19.6%
Real Estate	2.7%	1.1%
Utilities	0.4%	2.1%
Industrials	0.3%	7.6%
Consumer Defensive	0.2%	3.0%
Healthcare	0.0%	2.9%
Basic Materials	-	6.6%
Energy	-	4.1%

Return for Risk

EMQQ vs. DBEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMQQ

EMQQ Risk / Return Rank: 4
EMQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
EMQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
EMQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
EMQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
EMQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5

DBEM

DBEM Risk / Return Rank: 93
DBEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
DBEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
DBEM Omega Ratio Rank: 93
DBEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
DBEM Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMQQ vs. DBEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMQQ	DBEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.65	3.69	-4.34
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.84	4.73	-5.57
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.66	-0.76
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.41	6.29	-6.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.83	25.09	-25.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMQQ vs. DBEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMQQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the DBEM Sharpe Ratio of 3.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMQQ and DBEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMQQ	DBEM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.65	3.69	-4.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.32	0.59	-0.91
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16	0.63	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.10	0.34	-0.24

Drawdowns

EMQQ vs. DBEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMQQ drawdown since its inception was -73.24%, which is greater than DBEM's maximum drawdown of -33.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ and DBEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMQQ	DBEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.24%	-33.51%	-39.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.96%	-10.51%	-19.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.96%	-15.12%	-14.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.31%	-30.48%	-35.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.24%	-33.51%	-39.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.59%	0.00%	-56.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.35%	-11.69%	-19.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.93%	2.63%	+12.30%

Volatility

EMQQ vs. DBEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF (EMQQ) is 6.58%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) has a volatility of 7.46%. This indicates that EMQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMQQ	DBEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.58%	7.46%	-0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.17%	15.50%	+0.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.46%	17.94%	+2.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.12%	17.08%	+16.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.60%	17.14%	+13.46%

EMQQ vs. DBEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than DBEM's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMQQ vs. DBEM - Dividend Comparison

EMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than DBEM's 1.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBEM Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF	1.38%	1.84%	2.48%	2.55%	2.65%	1.77%	1.74%	2.59%	2.85%	1.51%	1.59%	3.49%
EMQQ EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet ETF	3.75%	3.09%	1.70%	0.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.18%	1.29%	0.00%	0.94%	0.75%	0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMQQ and DBEM in my portfolio?

EMQQ and DBEM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMQQ or DBEM?

DBEM has higher volatility (7.46%) compared to EMQQ (6.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMQQ dropped -73.24% vs DBEM's -33.51%.

Which ETF is better, EMQQ or DBEM?

On 10-year performance, DBEM leads with 10.81% vs 4.86% for EMQQ. On fees, DBEM is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, EMQQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMQQ or DBEM?

Over the 10-year period, DBEM has performed better with a 10.81% return vs 4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMQQ or DBEM?

DBEM is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMQQ or DBEM?

EMQQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 1.38% for DBEM.

What is the main difference between EMQQ and DBEM?

EMQQ tracks EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet Index, while DBEM tracks MSCI EM US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for EMQQ and 0.66% for DBEM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.