EMNT vs. CSHI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EMNT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF) and CSHI (Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. EMNT is actively managed, while CSHI is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMNT returned 5.24%/yr vs 5.45%/yr for CSHI. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMNT charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for CSHI.

Performance

EMNT vs. CSHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT) and Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMNT achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly lower than CSHI's 2.26% return.

EMNT

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 1.64%
• 6M: 1.97%
• 1Y: 4.38%
• 3Y*: 5.24%
• 5Y*: 3.43%
• 10Y*: —

CSHI

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 2.26%
• 6M: 2.59%
• 1Y: 5.25%
• 3Y*: 5.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMNT vs. CSHI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
EMNT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF	1.64%	4.74%	5.79%	5.84%	0.48%
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF	2.26%	5.05%	5.66%	6.21%	1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between EMNT and CSHI is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2022	0.08

Return for Risk

EMNT vs. CSHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMNT

EMNT Risk / Return Rank: 99
EMNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
EMNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
EMNT Omega Ratio Rank: 99
EMNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
EMNT Martin Ratio Rank: 99

CSHI

CSHI Risk / Return Rank: 99
CSHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CSHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMNT vs. CSHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT) and Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMNT	CSHI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	10.63	6.16	+4.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	21.17	11.83	+9.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	5.63	2.75	+2.88
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	33.45	29.16	+4.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	235.99	154.18	+81.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMNT vs. CSHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMNT Sharpe Ratio is 10.63, which is higher than the CSHI Sharpe Ratio of 6.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMNT and CSHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMNT	CSHI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.63	6.16	+4.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	4.18	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.51	4.18	-0.67

Drawdowns

EMNT vs. CSHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMNT drawdown since its inception was -2.28%, which is greater than CSHI's maximum drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMNT and CSHI.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMNT	CSHI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.28%	-1.69%	-0.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.13%	-0.18%	+0.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.73%	-1.69%	+0.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-1.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	0.00%	-0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.23%	-0.03%	-0.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.02%	0.03%	-0.01%

Volatility

EMNT vs. CSHI - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT) has a higher volatility of 0.14% compared to Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) at 0.11%. This indicates that EMNT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMNT	CSHI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.14%	0.11%	+0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.34%	0.52%	-0.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41%	0.86%	-0.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.83%	1.32%	-0.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.86%	1.32%	-0.46%

EMNT vs. CSHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMNT has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than CSHI's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMNT vs. CSHI - Dividend Comparison

EMNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than CSHI's 4.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF	4.90%	5.11%	5.72%	6.15%	1.52%	0.00%	0.00%
EMNT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF	4.00%	4.46%	5.14%	4.62%	2.79%	0.66%	1.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMNT and CSHI in my portfolio?

EMNT and CSHI have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMNT or CSHI?

EMNT has higher volatility (0.14%) compared to CSHI (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMNT dropped -2.28% vs CSHI's -1.69%.

Which ETF is better, EMNT or CSHI?

On 3-year performance, CSHI leads with 5.45% vs 5.24% for EMNT. On fees, EMNT is cheaper at 0.24% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMNT or CSHI?

Over the 3-year period, CSHI has performed better with a 5.45% return vs 5.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMNT or CSHI?

EMNT is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for CSHI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMNT or CSHI?

CSHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 4.00% for EMNT.

What is the main difference between EMNT and CSHI?

They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for EMNT and 0.38% for CSHI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMNT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.63 vs 6.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.