EEMS vs. ECOW
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) and Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW).
EEMS and ECOW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EEMS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap Index. It was launched on Aug 16, 2011. ECOW is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on May 2, 2019. Both EEMS and ECOW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EEMS or ECOW.
Correlation
The correlation between EEMS and ECOW is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EEMS vs. ECOW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EEMS:
0.59
ECOW:
0.55
EEMS:
0.86
ECOW:
0.88
EEMS:
1.11
ECOW:
1.10
EEMS:
0.81
ECOW:
0.51
EEMS:
2.38
ECOW:
1.81
EEMS:
3.18%
ECOW:
5.13%
EEMS:
12.71%
ECOW:
16.88%
EEMS:
-48.89%
ECOW:
-40.27%
EEMS:
-7.01%
ECOW:
-10.89%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EEMS achieves a 3.70% return, which is significantly lower than ECOW's 4.49% return.
EEMS
3.70%
0.45%
-2.47%
5.73%
8.21%
5.41%
ECOW
4.49%
-1.56%
-0.77%
6.94%
0.76%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EEMS vs. ECOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
EEMS has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than ECOW's 0.70% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EEMS vs. ECOW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) and Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EEMS vs. ECOW - Dividend Comparison
EEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than ECOW's 5.23% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMS iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF | 2.58% | 2.69% | 0.89% | 3.56% | 2.14% | 2.64% | 3.06% | 2.47% | 2.51% | 2.33% | 2.67% | 2.15% |
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF | 5.23% | 5.46% | 7.50% | 4.39% | 3.35% | 8.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EEMS vs. ECOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EEMS drawdown since its inception was -48.89%, which is greater than ECOW's maximum drawdown of -40.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMS and ECOW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EEMS vs. ECOW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) is 3.18%, while Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that EEMS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.