EMKT vs. STXE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EMKT (Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF) and STXE (Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. EMKT is actively managed, while STXE is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMKT charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for STXE.

Performance

EMKT vs. STXE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMKT achieves a 30.02% return, which is significantly lower than STXE's 47.29% return.

EMKT

• 1D: -1.45%
• 1M: 11.71%
• YTD: 30.02%
• 6M: 31.86%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

STXE

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: 15.10%
• YTD: 47.29%
• 6M: 52.92%
• 1Y: 84.40%
• 3Y*: 29.77%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMKT vs. STXE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EMKT Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	30.02%	-1.29%
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF	47.29%	2.36%

Correlation

The correlation between EMKT and STXE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.91

Return for Risk

EMKT vs. STXE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STXE

STXE Risk / Return Rank: 92
STXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
STXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
STXE Omega Ratio Rank: 93
STXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
STXE Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMKT vs. STXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMKT	STXE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.33	1.57	+0.76

Drawdowns

EMKT vs. STXE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMKT drawdown since its inception was -14.21%, smaller than the maximum STXE drawdown of -18.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMKT and STXE.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMKT	STXE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.21%	-18.92%	+4.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.51%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.45%	-1.00%	-0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.04%	-3.72%	+0.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.54%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EMKT	STXE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.53%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	20.81%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.46%	22.95%	-0.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.46%	17.68%	+4.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.46%	17.68%	+4.78%

EMKT vs. STXE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMKT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than STXE's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMKT vs. STXE - Dividend Comparison

EMKT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STXE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
EMKT Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
STXE Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF	1.83%	2.66%	3.22%	1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMKT and STXE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, EMKT and STXE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, EMKT or STXE?

On fees, STXE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMKT or STXE?

STXE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for EMKT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMKT or STXE?

STXE has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.00% for EMKT.

What is the main difference between EMKT and STXE?

They also come from different issuers: Lazard and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for EMKT and 0.32% for STXE.