EMGF vs. BKEM

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

EMGF (iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF) and BKEM (BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EMGF tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Diversified Multiple-Factor Index while BKEM tracks the Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMGF returned 9.41%/yr vs 6.67%/yr for BKEM. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EMGF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for BKEM.

Performance

EMGF vs. BKEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EMGF having a 21.87% return and BKEM slightly higher at 22.14%.

EMGF

• 1D: 1.22%
• 1M: -3.65%
• 6M: 16.07%
• YTD: 21.87%
• 1Y: 36.60%
• 3Y*: 22.20%
• 5Y*: 9.41%
• 10Y*: 10.08%

BKEM

• 1D: 1.71%
• 1M: -3.22%
• 6M: 16.09%
• YTD: 22.14%
• 1Y: 38.83%
• 3Y*: 19.62%
• 5Y*: 6.67%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMGF vs. BKEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EMGF iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF	21.87%	31.41%	9.06%	10.86%	-16.55%	6.65%	37.95%
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF	22.14%	30.55%	7.53%	8.68%	-19.43%	-3.91%	48.44%

Correlation

The correlation between EMGF and BKEM is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020	0.96

The correlation between EMGF and BKEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMGF vs. BKEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMGF	BKEM
Technology	42.6%	43.0%
Financial Services	16.9%	16.9%
Industrials	8.0%	8.1%
Consumer Cyclical	7.6%	8.7%
Communication Services	5.8%	5.8%
Basic Materials	4.8%	5.7%
Energy	3.3%	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	3.1%	2.6%
Healthcare	2.6%	2.7%
Utilities	2.3%	2.0%
Real Estate	0.9%	1.1%

Return for Risk

EMGF vs. BKEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMGF

EMGF Risk / Return Rank: 61
EMGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
EMGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
EMGF Omega Ratio Rank: 62
EMGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
EMGF Martin Ratio Rank: 65

BKEM

BKEM Risk / Return Rank: 67
BKEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BKEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
BKEM Omega Ratio Rank: 67
BKEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
BKEM Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMGF vs. BKEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMGF	BKEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.70	-0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	2.22	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.32	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.72	2.98	-0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.21	10.09	-0.88

EMGF vs. BKEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMGF Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the BKEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMGF and BKEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMGF vs. BKEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMGF drawdown since its inception was -40.23%, roughly equal to the maximum BKEM drawdown of -39.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMGF and BKEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMGF	BKEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.23%	-39.48%	-0.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.54%	-13.11%	-0.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.65%	-18.38%	+0.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.17%	-33.89%	+5.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.35%	-7.51%	-0.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.00%	-15.80%	+5.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.98%	3.86%	+0.12%

Volatility

EMGF vs. BKEM - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) have volatilities of 10.12% and 10.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMGF	BKEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.12%	10.25%	-0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.57%	20.99%	+0.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.42%	22.93%	+0.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.54%	19.51%	-0.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.72%	19.65%	+0.07%

EMGF vs. BKEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMGF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than BKEM's 0.11% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMGF vs. BKEM - Dividend Comparison

EMGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than BKEM's 1.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF	1.92%	2.25%	2.76%	3.02%	3.15%	2.22%	1.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EMGF iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF	2.06%	2.52%	3.42%	5.94%	4.04%	2.48%	1.95%	2.63%	2.73%	1.94%	2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMGF and BKEM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, EMGF and BKEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EMGF or BKEM?

BKEM has higher volatility (10.25%) compared to EMGF (10.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMGF dropped -40.23% vs BKEM's -39.48%.

Which ETF is better, EMGF or BKEM?

On 5-year performance, EMGF leads with 9.41% vs 6.67% for BKEM. On fees, BKEM is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, EMGF has been the lower-risk option at 10.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMGF or BKEM?

Over the 5-year period, EMGF has performed better with a 9.41% return vs 6.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMGF or BKEM?

BKEM is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EMGF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMGF or BKEM?

EMGF has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 1.92% for BKEM.

What is the main difference between EMGF and BKEM?

EMGF tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Diversified Multiple-Factor Index, while BKEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EMGF and 0.11% for BKEM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BKEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.