EMGF vs. FDEM

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

EMGF (iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF) and FDEM (Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EMGF tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Diversified Multiple-Factor Index while FDEM tracks the Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMGF returned 11.39%/yr vs 10.15%/yr for FDEM. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.45% expense ratio.

Performance

EMGF vs. FDEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMGF achieves a 32.97% return, which is significantly higher than FDEM's 24.40% return.

EMGF

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 8.68%
• YTD: 32.97%
• 6M: 34.74%
• 1Y: 55.99%
• 3Y*: 27.87%
• 5Y*: 11.39%
• 10Y*: 11.88%

FDEM

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 6.72%
• YTD: 24.40%
• 6M: 25.99%
• 1Y: 45.23%
• 3Y*: 24.48%
• 5Y*: 10.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMGF vs. FDEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EMGF iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF	32.97%	31.41%	9.06%	10.86%	-16.55%	6.65%	10.27%	8.40%
FDEM Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF	24.40%	26.75%	9.34%	17.26%	-13.11%	-3.52%	8.87%	5.60%

Correlation

The correlation between EMGF and FDEM is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2019	0.90

The correlation between EMGF and FDEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMGF vs. FDEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMGF	FDEM
Technology	41.4%	38.5%
Financial Services	17.4%	15.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	11.5%
Industrials	7.2%	4.4%
Communication Services	6.5%	9.6%
Basic Materials	5.3%	2.7%
Energy	3.6%	7.3%
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	6.5%
Healthcare	2.4%	-
Utilities	2.3%	-
Real Estate	1.0%	4.6%

Return for Risk

EMGF vs. FDEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMGF

EMGF Risk / Return Rank: 81
EMGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
EMGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
EMGF Omega Ratio Rank: 83
EMGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
EMGF Martin Ratio Rank: 80

FDEM

FDEM Risk / Return Rank: 75
FDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMGF vs. FDEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMGF	FDEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	2.37	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.28	3.07	+0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.44	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.16	3.58	+0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.36	13.46	+1.90

EMGF vs. FDEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMGF Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the FDEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMGF and FDEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMGF vs. FDEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMGF drawdown since its inception was -40.23%, which is greater than FDEM's maximum drawdown of -33.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMGF and FDEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMGF	FDEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.23%	-33.65%	-6.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.54%	-12.70%	-0.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.65%	-16.04%	-1.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.20%	-28.47%	+0.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.01%	+0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.02%	-8.80%	-1.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.66%	3.37%	+0.29%

Volatility

EMGF vs. FDEM - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF) has a higher volatility of 11.17% compared to Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF (FDEM) at 9.83%. This indicates that EMGF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMGF	FDEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.17%	9.83%	+1.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.89%	17.25%	+2.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.01%	19.19%	+2.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.18%	16.57%	+1.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.63%	18.13%	+1.50%

EMGF vs. FDEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EMGF and FDEM have an expense ratio of 0.45%.

Dividends

EMGF vs. FDEM - Dividend Comparison

EMGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than FDEM's 2.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EMGF iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF	1.89%	2.52%	3.42%	5.94%	4.04%	2.48%	1.95%	2.63%	2.73%	1.94%	2.04%
FDEM Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF	2.81%	3.23%	4.05%	4.41%	3.95%	2.71%	1.84%	2.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMGF and FDEM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, EMGF and FDEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EMGF or FDEM?

EMGF has higher volatility (11.17%) compared to FDEM (9.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMGF dropped -40.23% vs FDEM's -33.65%.

Which ETF is better, EMGF or FDEM?

On 5-year performance, EMGF leads with 11.39% vs 10.15% for FDEM. Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. On volatility, FDEM has been the lower-risk option at 9.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMGF or FDEM?

Over the 5-year period, EMGF has performed better with a 11.39% return vs 10.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMGF or FDEM?

EMGF and FDEM have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMGF or FDEM?

FDEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 1.89% for EMGF.

What is the main difference between EMGF and FDEM?

EMGF tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Diversified Multiple-Factor Index, while FDEM tracks Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMGF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.