PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMGF vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMGF vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMGF achieves a 18.62% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 10.13% return. Over the past 10 years, EMGF has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 9.61%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.07% annualized return.


EMGF

1D
0.83%
1M
-3.34%
6M
9.69%
YTD
18.62%
1Y
33.99%
3Y*
20.71%
5Y*
9.49%
10Y*
9.61%
ALL TIME*
10.03%

SPY

1D
0.72%
1M
0.30%
6M
8.53%
YTD
10.13%
1Y
21.49%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
15.07%
ALL TIME*
10.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.26M$12.00M$11.68M
$37.27B$35.99B$39.23B

EMGF vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMGF
iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
18.62%31.41%9.06%10.86%-16.55%6.65%10.27%20.96%-19.71%42.37%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
10.13%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between EMGF and SPY is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2015

0.63

The correlation between EMGF and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EMGF vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMGF
SPY

Technology

42.6%
36.9%

Financial Services

17.8%
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
8.9%

Industrials

7.5%
7.6%

Communication Services

6.4%
9.7%

Basic Materials

5.0%
1.9%

Energy

3.4%
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
4.8%

Healthcare

2.7%
9.4%

Utilities

2.2%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.0%
2.0%

Technology

EMGF
42.6%
SPY
36.9%

Financial Services

EMGF
17.8%
SPY
12.5%

Consumer Cyclical

EMGF
8.2%
SPY
8.9%

Industrials

EMGF
7.5%
SPY
7.6%

Communication Services

EMGF
6.4%
SPY
9.7%

Basic Materials

EMGF
5.0%
SPY
1.9%

Energy

EMGF
3.4%
SPY
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

EMGF
3.1%
SPY
4.8%

Healthcare

EMGF
2.7%
SPY
9.4%

Utilities

EMGF
2.2%
SPY
2.6%

Real Estate

EMGF
1.0%
SPY
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMGF vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EMGF
EMGF Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
EMGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMGF Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EMGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMGF Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EMGF vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMGFSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.27

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.20

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.04

9.40

-2.36

EMGF vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMGF Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMGF and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMGF vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMGF drawdown since its inception was -40.23%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMGF and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMGFSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.23%

-55.19%

+14.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.63%

-8.88%

-5.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.65%

-18.76%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.17%

-24.50%

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.23%

-33.72%

-6.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.79%

-1.40%

-9.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.01%

-9.01%

-1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.67%

2.08%

+2.59%

Volatility

EMGF vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (EMGF) has a higher volatility of 8.59% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 3.58%. This indicates that EMGF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMGFSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.59%

3.58%

+5.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.28%

10.14%

+12.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.21%

12.89%

+11.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.66%

17.18%

+1.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.79%

17.95%

+1.84%

EMGF vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMGF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMGF vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

EMGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, more than SPY's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMGF
iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
2.12%2.52%3.42%5.94%4.04%2.48%1.95%2.63%2.73%1.94%2.04%0.00%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.01%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMGF and SPY have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMGF has higher volatility (8.59%) compared to SPY (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMGF dropped -40.23% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.07% vs 9.61% for EMGF. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.07% return vs 9.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EMGF.

EMGF has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 1.01% for SPY.

EMGF is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. EMGF tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Diversified Multiple-Factor Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EMGF and 0.09% for SPY.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMGF and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer