EME vs. NLR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

EME (EMCOR Group, Inc.) is a stock, while NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) is Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Over the past 10 years, EME returned 33.61%/yr vs 12.80%/yr for NLR. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

EME vs. NLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EME achieves a 34.68% return, which is significantly higher than NLR's -1.81% return. Over the past 10 years, EME has outperformed NLR with an annualized return of 33.61%, while NLR has yielded a comparatively lower 12.80% annualized return.

EME

• 1D: 1.42%
• 1M: -10.83%
• YTD: 34.68%
• 6M: 32.12%
• 1Y: 73.63%
• 3Y*: 67.29%
• 5Y*: 45.87%
• 10Y*: 33.61%

NLR

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: -10.59%
• YTD: -1.81%
• 6M: -3.70%
• 1Y: 18.72%
• 3Y*: 29.88%
• 5Y*: 19.78%
• 10Y*: 12.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EME vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EME EMCOR Group, Inc.	34.68%	35.05%	111.27%	46.03%	16.81%	39.93%	6.47%	45.18%	-26.68%	16.09%
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	-1.81%	56.50%	14.26%	36.67%	2.29%	13.63%	3.49%	0.20%	4.94%	8.25%

Correlation

The correlation between EME and NLR is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2007	0.47

The correlation between EME and NLR shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (10 years) to 0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EME vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EME

EME Risk / Return Rank: 85
EME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
EME Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
EME Omega Ratio Rank: 86
EME Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
EME Martin Ratio Rank: 83

NLR

NLR Risk / Return Rank: 18
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 18
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EME vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EME	NLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	0.44	+1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	0.90	+1.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.10	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.94	0.63	+2.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.26	1.41	+5.85

EME vs. NLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EME Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the NLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EME and NLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EME vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EME drawdown since its inception was -70.56%, which is greater than NLR's maximum drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EME and NLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	EME	NLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.56%	-65.05%	-5.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.15%	-29.72%	+4.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.19%	-30.48%	-5.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.19%	-30.48%	-5.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.00%	-34.35%	-13.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.79%	-25.81%	+13.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.36%	-35.70%	+20.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.18%	13.33%	-3.15%

Volatility

EME vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) is 10.65%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 13.73%. This indicates that EME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EME	NLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.65%	13.73%	-3.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.55%	33.75%	-7.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.62%	42.85%	-4.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.44%	29.56%	+3.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.04%	24.22%	+8.82%

Dividends

EME vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison

EME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than NLR's 2.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EME EMCOR Group, Inc.	0.16%	0.16%	0.20%	0.32%	0.36%	0.41%	0.35%	0.37%	0.54%	0.39%	0.45%	0.67%
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	2.60%	2.55%	0.76%	4.54%	2.02%	1.99%	2.23%	2.21%	3.91%	4.86%	3.62%	3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EME and NLR in my portfolio?

EME and NLR have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EME or NLR?

NLR has higher volatility (13.73%) compared to EME (10.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EME dropped -70.56% vs NLR's -65.05%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.