EME vs. QSR
Compare and contrast key facts about EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) and Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EME or QSR.
Correlation
The correlation between EME and QSR is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
EME vs. QSR - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EME:
3.72
QSR:
-0.35
EME:
3.99
QSR:
-0.36
EME:
1.60
QSR:
0.96
EME:
8.03
QSR:
-0.40
EME:
23.60
QSR:
-0.65
EME:
4.97%
QSR:
11.79%
EME:
31.53%
QSR:
21.94%
EME:
-70.56%
QSR:
-63.03%
EME:
-11.60%
QSR:
-16.63%
Fundamentals
EME:
$21.94B
QSR:
$30.58B
EME:
$19.67
QSR:
$3.99
EME:
24.25
QSR:
16.91
EME:
1.32
QSR:
1.79
EME:
$14.24B
QSR:
$7.97B
EME:
$2.63B
QSR:
$4.74B
EME:
$1.38B
QSR:
$2.63B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EME achieves a 116.82% return, which is significantly higher than QSR's -11.70% return. Over the past 10 years, EME has outperformed QSR with an annualized return of 27.09%, while QSR has yielded a comparatively lower 8.42% annualized return.
EME
116.82%
-9.69%
22.32%
118.25%
39.94%
27.09%
QSR
-11.70%
-2.94%
-1.91%
-9.63%
4.17%
8.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EME vs. QSR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) and Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EME vs. QSR - Dividend Comparison
EME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than QSR's 3.47% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EME EMCOR Group, Inc. | 0.20% | 0.32% | 0.36% | 0.41% | 0.35% | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.67% | 0.72% | 0.42% |
QSR Restaurant Brands International Inc. | 3.47% | 2.82% | 3.34% | 3.49% | 3.40% | 3.14% | 3.44% | 1.27% | 1.30% | 1.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EME vs. QSR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EME drawdown since its inception was -70.56%, which is greater than QSR's maximum drawdown of -63.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EME and QSR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EME vs. QSR - Volatility Comparison
EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) has a higher volatility of 9.00% compared to Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) at 5.84%. This indicates that EME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QSR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
EME vs. QSR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EMCOR Group, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities