EME vs. ACLS

In the year-to-date period, EME achieves a 139.25% return, which is significantly higher than ACLS's -45.83% return. Over the past 10 years, EME has outperformed ACLS with an annualized return of 28.33%, while ACLS has yielded a comparatively lower 23.49% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) and Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current EME Sharpe Ratio is 4.58, which is higher than the ACLS Sharpe Ratio of -0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EME and ACLS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

EME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, while ACLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum EME drawdown since its inception was -70.56%, smaller than the maximum ACLS drawdown of -99.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EME and ACLS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) is 9.76%, while Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) has a volatility of 10.92%. This indicates that EME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EMCOR Group, Inc. and Axcelis Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.