EME vs. PWR

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR).

Performance

EME vs. PWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EME vs. PWR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EME EMCOR Group, Inc.	24.23%	35.05%	111.27%	46.03%	16.81%	39.93%	6.47%	45.18%	-26.68%	16.09%
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.	32.75%	33.70%	46.60%	51.70%	24.63%	59.50%	77.74%	35.84%	-22.93%	12.22%

Fundamentals

Market Cap EME : $34.22B PWR : $84.96B
EPS EME : $28.22 PWR : $6.79
PE Ratio EME : 26.92 PWR : 82.44
PEG Ratio EME : 0.63 PWR : 4.08
PS Ratio EME : 2.01 PWR : 2.99
PB Ratio EME : 9.31 PWR : 9.51
Total Revenue (TTM) EME : $16.99B PWR : $28.35B
Gross Profit (TTM) EME : $3.33B PWR : $3.69B
EBITDA (TTM) EME : $1.84B PWR : $2.61B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EME achieves a 24.23% return, which is significantly lower than PWR's 32.75% return. Over the past 10 years, EME has underperformed PWR with an annualized return of 32.17%, while PWR has yielded a comparatively higher 38.21% annualized return.

EME

• 1D: 2.88%
• 1M: 3.23%
• YTD: 24.23%
• 6M: 16.09%
• 1Y: 102.70%
• 3Y*: 67.63%
• 5Y*: 46.72%
• 10Y*: 32.17%

PWR

• 1D: 2.02%
• 1M: -2.19%
• YTD: 32.75%
• 6M: 33.19%
• 1Y: 117.43%
• 3Y*: 50.01%
• 5Y*: 44.67%
• 10Y*: 38.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

EME vs. PWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EME

EME Risk / Return Rank: 91
EME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
EME Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
EME Omega Ratio Rank: 92
EME Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
EME Martin Ratio Rank: 90

PWR

PWR Risk / Return Rank: 97
PWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
PWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
PWR Omega Ratio Rank: 95
PWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PWR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EME vs. PWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EME	PWR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	3.32	-0.76
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.84	3.85	-1.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.52	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.21	10.34	-6.13
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.89	25.41	-14.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EME vs. PWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EME Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the PWR Sharpe Ratio of 3.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EME and PWR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EME	PWR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.56	3.32	-0.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.43	1.30	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.99	1.15	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.34	+0.26

Correlation

The correlation between EME and PWR is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

EME vs. PWR - Dividend Comparison

EME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, more than PWR's 0.07% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EME EMCOR Group, Inc.	0.15%	0.16%	0.20%	0.32%	0.36%	0.41%	0.35%	0.37%	0.54%	0.39%	0.45%	0.67%
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.	0.07%	0.09%	0.09%	0.15%	0.25%	0.16%	0.29%	0.42%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

EME vs. PWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EME drawdown since its inception was -70.56%, smaller than the maximum PWR drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EME and PWR.

Drawdown Indicators

	EME	PWR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.56%	-97.07%	+26.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.15%	-11.66%	-13.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.19%	-33.89%	-2.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.00%	-45.53%	-2.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.55%	-3.17%	-3.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.43%	-47.14%	+31.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.73%	4.75%	+4.98%

Volatility

EME vs. PWR - Volatility Comparison

EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) has a higher volatility of 11.93% compared to Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) at 11.33%. This indicates that EME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EME	PWR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.93%	11.33%	+0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.55%	26.47%	+6.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.30%	35.59%	+4.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.91%	34.67%	-1.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.76%	33.20%	-0.44%

Financials

EME vs. PWR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between EMCOR Group, Inc. and Quanta Services, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

EME - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 935.60M and revenue of 4.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.7%.

PWR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 985.00M and revenue of 7.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.6%.

EME - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 531.64M and revenue of 4.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

PWR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 485.00M and revenue of 7.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.2%.

EME - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported a net income of 431.79M and revenue of 4.52B, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.

PWR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 315.50M and revenue of 7.84B, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.