PortfoliosLab logo
EME vs. PWR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between EME and PWR is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

EME vs. PWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EME:

0.60

PWR:

0.73

Sortino Ratio

EME:

1.00

PWR:

1.19

Omega Ratio

EME:

1.15

PWR:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

EME:

0.72

PWR:

0.92

Martin Ratio

EME:

1.77

PWR:

2.28

Ulcer Index

EME:

14.69%

PWR:

13.61%

Daily Std Dev

EME:

42.89%

PWR:

42.43%

Max Drawdown

EME:

-70.56%

PWR:

-97.07%

Current Drawdown

EME:

-12.17%

PWR:

-3.66%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EME:

$20.78B

PWR:

$50.44B

EPS

EME:

$22.63

PWR:

$6.21

PE Ratio

EME:

20.52

PWR:

54.81

PEG Ratio

EME:

1.32

PWR:

2.11

PS Ratio

EME:

1.39

PWR:

2.03

PB Ratio

EME:

7.08

PWR:

6.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

EME:

$15.00B

PWR:

$24.87B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EME:

$2.90B

PWR:

$3.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

EME:

$1.56B

PWR:

$2.24B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EME achieves a 3.76% return, which is significantly lower than PWR's 9.17% return. Over the past 10 years, EME has underperformed PWR with an annualized return of 26.82%, while PWR has yielded a comparatively higher 28.21% annualized return.


EME

YTD

3.76%

1M

23.10%

6M

-5.59%

1Y

25.55%

5Y*

53.27%

10Y*

26.82%

PWR

YTD

9.17%

1M

27.96%

6M

6.71%

1Y

30.87%

5Y*

62.09%

10Y*

28.21%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

EME vs. PWR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EME
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EME is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EME is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EME is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EME is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EME is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EME is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

PWR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PWR is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PWR is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PWR is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PWR is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PWR is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PWR is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EME vs. PWR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EME Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is comparable to the PWR Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EME and PWR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

EME vs. PWR - Dividend Comparison

EME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, more than PWR's 0.11% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EME
EMCOR Group, Inc.
0.21%0.20%0.32%0.36%0.41%0.35%0.37%0.54%0.39%0.45%0.67%0.72%
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
0.11%0.09%0.15%0.25%0.16%0.29%0.42%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EME vs. PWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EME drawdown since its inception was -70.56%, smaller than the maximum PWR drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EME and PWR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

EME vs. PWR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) is 10.68%, while Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) has a volatility of 12.84%. This indicates that EME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

EME vs. PWR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EMCOR Group, Inc. and Quanta Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20212022202320242025
3.87B
6.23B
(EME) Total Revenue
(PWR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EME vs. PWR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between EMCOR Group, Inc. and Quanta Services, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

12.0%14.0%16.0%18.0%20.0%20212022202320242025
18.7%
13.4%
(EME) Gross Margin
(PWR) Gross Margin
EME - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 722.72M and revenue of 3.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.7%.

PWR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 834.04M and revenue of 6.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.4%.

EME - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 318.76M and revenue of 3.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.2%.

PWR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 239.08M and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.

EME - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported a net income of 240.68M and revenue of 3.87B, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.

PWR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 144.26M and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in a net margin of 2.3%.