EMDZX vs. PALDX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

EMDZX (PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund) and PALDX (PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund) are both mutual funds - EMDZX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by PGIM, while PALDX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by PGIM. Over the past 5 years, EMDZX returned 1.98%/yr vs 9.57%/yr for PALDX. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMDZX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for PALDX.

Performance

EMDZX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund (EMDZX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMDZX achieves a 1.09% return, which is significantly lower than PALDX's 7.39% return.

EMDZX

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 2.03%
• YTD: 1.09%
• 6M: 2.26%
• 1Y: 10.23%
• 3Y*: 6.59%
• 5Y*: 1.98%
• 10Y*: 2.82%

PALDX

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 0.94%
• YTD: 7.39%
• 6M: 7.16%
• 1Y: 20.27%
• 3Y*: 16.07%
• 5Y*: 9.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMDZX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EMDZX PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund	1.09%	19.52%	-3.79%	11.51%	-10.60%	-9.69%	5.01%	15.09%	-8.29%	-1.42%
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund	7.39%	13.62%	18.96%	18.90%	-15.65%	16.30%	10.68%	22.27%	-4.12%	5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between EMDZX and PALDX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2017	0.44

The correlation between EMDZX and PALDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EMDZX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMDZX

EMDZX Risk / Return Rank: 20
EMDZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
EMDZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
EMDZX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
EMDZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
EMDZX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

PALDX

PALDX Risk / Return Rank: 81
PALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
PALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
PALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
PALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
PALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMDZX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund (EMDZX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMDZX	PALDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	2.43	-1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.86	3.45	-1.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.46	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.18	3.40	-2.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.90	15.74	-11.84

EMDZX vs. PALDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMDZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the PALDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMDZX and PALDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMDZX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMDZX drawdown since its inception was -32.79%, which is greater than PALDX's maximum drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDZX and PALDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMDZX	PALDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.79%	-26.16%	-6.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.54%	-5.96%	-2.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.54%	-16.06%	+7.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.42%	-20.47%	-2.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.62%	-0.46%	-2.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.09%	-4.07%	-9.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	1.29%	+1.28%

Volatility

EMDZX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund (EMDZX) is 2.37%, while PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) has a volatility of 3.29%. This indicates that EMDZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMDZX	PALDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.37%	3.29%	-0.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.18%	6.78%	+0.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.15%	8.34%	-0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.92%	12.17%	-4.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.98%	12.70%	-3.72%

EMDZX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMDZX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMDZX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison

EMDZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, more than PALDX's 5.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMDZX PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund	6.42%	5.93%	5.58%	5.11%	4.11%	4.55%	4.64%	5.46%	6.31%	6.00%	6.19%	6.92%
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund	5.05%	5.42%	10.40%	2.94%	6.19%	6.87%	2.58%	4.58%	3.65%	1.48%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMDZX and PALDX in my portfolio?

EMDZX and PALDX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMDZX or PALDX?

PALDX has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to EMDZX (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMDZX dropped -32.79% vs PALDX's -26.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PALDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.