PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMDZX vs. VEGBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMDZX vs. VEGBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund (EMDZX) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond Fund Admiral Shares (VEGBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMDZX achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than VEGBX's 2.18% return.


EMDZX

1D
0.41%
1M
-0.81%
6M
-0.67%
YTD
1.26%
1Y
8.35%
3Y*
5.67%
5Y*
1.96%
10Y*
2.53%
ALL TIME*
1.00%

VEGBX

1D
-0.16%
1M
-1.12%
6M
1.65%
YTD
2.18%
1Y
8.90%
3Y*
9.99%
5Y*
4.15%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

EMDZX vs. VEGBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMDZX
PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund
1.26%19.52%-3.79%11.51%-10.60%-9.69%5.01%15.09%-8.29%13.32%
VEGBX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond Fund Admiral Shares
2.18%14.46%7.60%13.81%-13.02%-1.44%15.18%17.87%-0.66%11.65%

Correlation

The correlation between EMDZX and VEGBX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.55

The correlation between EMDZX and VEGBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMDZX vs. VEGBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EMDZX
EMDZX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
EMDZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMDZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMDZX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EMDZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMDZX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

VEGBX
VEGBX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VEGBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEGBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEGBX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VEGBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEGBX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EMDZX vs. VEGBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund (EMDZX) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond Fund Admiral Shares (VEGBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMDZXVEGBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.42

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

2.46

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.51

10.42

-6.91

EMDZX vs. VEGBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMDZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the VEGBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMDZX and VEGBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMDZX vs. VEGBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMDZX drawdown since its inception was -32.79%, which is greater than VEGBX's maximum drawdown of -24.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDZX and VEGBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMDZXVEGBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.79%

-24.27%

-8.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.54%

-3.79%

-4.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.54%

-4.96%

-3.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.42%

-24.27%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.47%

-1.41%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.01%

-3.79%

-9.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

0.89%

+1.79%

Volatility

EMDZX vs. VEGBX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund (EMDZX) has a higher volatility of 2.05% compared to Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond Fund Admiral Shares (VEGBX) at 0.98%. This indicates that EMDZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEGBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMDZXVEGBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.05%

0.98%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.33%

3.70%

+3.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.17%

4.36%

+3.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.94%

6.37%

+1.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.87%

6.33%

+2.54%

EMDZX vs. VEGBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMDZX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than VEGBX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMDZX vs. VEGBX - Dividend Comparison

EMDZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, more than VEGBX's 5.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMDZX
PGIM Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund
5.99%5.93%5.58%5.11%4.11%4.55%4.64%5.46%6.31%6.00%6.19%6.92%
VEGBX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Bond Fund Admiral Shares
5.63%6.34%7.02%7.20%5.61%5.14%4.62%6.42%5.00%0.39%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMDZX and VEGBX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMDZX has higher volatility (2.05%) compared to VEGBX (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMDZX dropped -32.79% vs VEGBX's -24.27%.

VEGBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMDZX and VEGBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer