EMDM vs. FLKR
EMDM (First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMDM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies Index - Benchmark TR Net, while FLKR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, EMDM returned 30.34%/yr vs 45.52%/yr for FLKR. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMDM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLKR.
Performance
EMDM vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMDM achieves a 36.28% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 98.10% return.
EMDM
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 6.11%
- YTD
- 36.28%
- 6M
- 42.03%
- 1Y
- 83.08%
- 3Y*
- 30.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLKR
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 9.35%
- YTD
- 98.10%
- 6M
- 113.45%
- 1Y
- 191.57%
- 3Y*
- 45.52%
- 5Y*
- 17.78%
- 10Y*
- —
EMDM vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EMDM First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF | 36.28% | 59.68% | -4.93% | 14.75% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 98.10% | 91.91% | -18.84% | 13.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMDM and FLKR is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2023 | 0.78 |
The correlation between EMDM and FLKR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMDM vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank
EMDM
FLKR
EMDM vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMDM | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.58 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.18 | 8.11 | -2.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.59 | 28.21 | -7.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMDM vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMDM drawdown since its inception was -18.81%, smaller than the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDM and FLKR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMDM | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.81% | -50.06% | +31.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.65% | -23.03% | +7.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.81% | -26.39% | +7.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -49.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.27% | -9.25% | +5.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -22.03% | +17.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.93% | 6.61% | -2.68% |
Volatility
EMDM vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) is 12.16%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 25.85%. This indicates that EMDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMDM | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.16% | 25.85% | -13.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.86% | 42.11% | -19.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.23% | 45.82% | -20.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.36% | 29.58% | -9.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.36% | 28.37% | -8.01% |
EMDM vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMDM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMDM vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison
EMDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than FLKR's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMDM First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF | 2.62% | 3.57% | 5.87% | 2.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 1.95% | 3.87% | 7.08% | 2.28% | 3.13% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 2.09% | 1.86% | 1.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMDM and FLKR have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLKR has higher volatility (25.85%) compared to EMDM (12.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMDM dropped -18.81% vs FLKR's -50.06%.
On 3-year performance, FLKR leads with 45.52% vs 30.34% for EMDM. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EMDM has been the lower-risk option at 12.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 45.52% return vs 30.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EMDM.
EMDM has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 1.95% for FLKR.
EMDM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while FLKR is Asia Pacific Equities. EMDM tracks Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies Index - Benchmark TR Net, while FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EMDM and 0.09% for FLKR.
FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.08 vs 3.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMDM and FLKR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer