PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMDM vs. EUFN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMDM vs. EUFN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) and iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMDM achieves a 27.86% return, which is significantly higher than EUFN's 15.76% return.


EMDM

1D
0.46%
1M
-3.52%
6M
13.18%
YTD
27.86%
1Y
66.00%
3Y*
26.67%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
26.46%

EUFN

1D
-0.05%
1M
4.57%
6M
12.34%
YTD
15.76%
1Y
37.30%
3Y*
34.07%
5Y*
21.90%
10Y*
14.87%
ALL TIME*
7.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$660.85K$757.43K$571.79K
$57.65M$60.11M$50.38M

EMDM vs. EUFN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EMDM
First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF
27.86%59.68%-4.93%14.75%
EUFN
iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF
15.76%65.73%17.20%11.52%

Correlation

The correlation between EMDM and EUFN is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2023

0.66

The correlation between EMDM and EUFN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMDM vs. EUFN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMDM
EUFN

Technology

39.9%
0.9%

Financial Services

25.6%
98.1%

Basic Materials

12.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
0.2%

Energy

4.8%

-

Communication Services

4.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.1%

-

Industrials

2.6%
0.4%

Utilities

1.5%

-

Healthcare

0.5%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

EMDM
39.9%
EUFN
0.9%

Financial Services

EMDM
25.6%
EUFN
98.1%

Basic Materials

EMDM
12.7%
EUFN

-

Consumer Cyclical

EMDM
5.3%
EUFN
0.2%

Energy

EMDM
4.8%
EUFN

-

Communication Services

EMDM
4.0%
EUFN

-

Consumer Defensive

EMDM
3.1%
EUFN

-

Industrials

EMDM
2.6%
EUFN
0.4%

Utilities

EMDM
1.5%
EUFN

-

Healthcare

EMDM
0.5%
EUFN

-

Real Estate

EMDM

-

EUFN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMDM vs. EUFN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EMDM
EMDM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
EMDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMDM Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
EMDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMDM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

EUFN
EUFN Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
EUFN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUFN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUFN Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
EUFN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUFN Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EMDM vs. EUFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) and iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMDMEUFNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.30

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.23

2.43

+1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.54

8.55

+4.98

EMDM vs. EUFN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMDM Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the EUFN Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMDM and EUFN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMDM vs. EUFN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMDM drawdown since its inception was -18.81%, smaller than the maximum EUFN drawdown of -53.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDM and EUFN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMDMEUFNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.81%

-53.25%

+34.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.65%

-14.77%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.81%

-15.95%

-2.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.88%

-0.05%

-10.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

-14.42%

+10.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.88%

4.20%

+0.68%

Volatility

EMDM vs. EUFN - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) has a higher volatility of 9.95% compared to iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN) at 6.32%. This indicates that EMDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUFN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMDMEUFNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.95%

6.32%

+3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.55%

17.74%

+7.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.87%

20.39%

+7.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.16%

21.81%

-0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.16%

23.71%

-2.55%

EMDM vs. EUFN - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMDM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EUFN's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMDM vs. EUFN - Dividend Comparison

EMDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, less than EUFN's 3.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMDM
First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF
2.96%3.57%5.87%2.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EUFN
iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF
3.96%3.57%5.36%5.00%4.24%4.15%1.38%4.55%6.48%3.04%4.03%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMDM and EUFN have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMDM has higher volatility (9.95%) compared to EUFN (6.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMDM dropped -18.81% vs EUFN's -53.25%.

On 3-year performance, EUFN leads with 34.07% vs 26.67% for EMDM. On fees, EUFN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EUFN has been the lower-risk option at 6.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, EUFN has performed better with a 34.07% return vs 26.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EUFN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EMDM.

EUFN has the higher dividend yield at 3.96%, compared with 2.96% for EMDM.

EMDM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EUFN is Financials Equities. EMDM tracks Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies Index - Benchmark TR Net, while EUFN tracks MSCI Europe Financials Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EMDM and 0.49% for EUFN.

EMDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMDM and EUFN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer