PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMDM vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMDM vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMDM achieves a 40.89% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 11.69% return.


EMDM

1D
0.81%
1M
12.12%
YTD
40.89%
6M
47.96%
1Y
93.35%
3Y*
33.55%
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMDM vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EMDM
First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF
40.89%59.68%-4.93%14.21%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%19.54%

Correlation

The correlation between EMDM and VOO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2023

0.68

The correlation between EMDM and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMDM vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMDM
VOO

Technology

32.1%
35.7%

Financial Services

27.2%
11.6%

Basic Materials

15.1%
1.8%

Energy

6.3%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
10.2%

Communication Services

4.3%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
4.9%

Industrials

3.3%
8.3%

Utilities

1.9%
2.4%

Healthcare

0.5%
8.5%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

EMDM
32.1%
VOO
35.7%

Financial Services

EMDM
27.2%
VOO
11.6%

Basic Materials

EMDM
15.1%
VOO
1.8%

Energy

EMDM
6.3%
VOO
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

EMDM
6.0%
VOO
10.2%

Communication Services

EMDM
4.3%
VOO
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

EMDM
3.4%
VOO
4.9%

Industrials

EMDM
3.3%
VOO
8.3%

Utilities

EMDM
1.9%
VOO
2.4%

Healthcare

EMDM
0.5%
VOO
8.5%

Real Estate

EMDM

-

VOO
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMDM vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMDM
EMDM Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
EMDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMDM Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EMDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMDM Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMDM vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMDMVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.02

2.53

+1.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.65

3.43

+1.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.46

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.08

3.42

+2.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

25.25

15.95

+9.31

EMDM vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMDM Sharpe Ratio is 4.02, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMDM and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMDMVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.02

2.53

+1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.61

0.89

+0.72

Drawdowns

EMDM vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMDM drawdown since its inception was -18.81%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMDM and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMDMVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.81%

-33.99%

+15.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.65%

-8.90%

-6.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.81%

-18.69%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-3.69%

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.77%

1.91%

+1.86%

Volatility

EMDM vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF (EMDM) has a higher volatility of 9.47% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that EMDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMDMVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.47%

2.74%

+6.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.73%

8.88%

+11.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.38%

11.78%

+11.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.78%

16.81%

+2.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.78%

18.01%

+1.77%

EMDM vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMDM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMDM vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

EMDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMDM
First Trust Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies ETF
2.53%3.57%5.87%2.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMDM and VOO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMDM has higher volatility (9.47%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMDM dropped -18.81% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 3-year performance, EMDM leads with 33.55% vs 22.73% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, EMDM has performed better with a 33.55% return vs 22.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EMDM.

EMDM has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 1.02% for VOO.

EMDM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while VOO is S&P 500. EMDM tracks Bloomberg Emerging Market Democracies Index - Benchmark TR Net, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EMDM and 0.03% for VOO.

EMDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.02 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMDM and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer