EMA vs. QQQ

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

EMA (Emera Inc) is a stock, while QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past year, EMA returned 25.17% vs 27.28% for QQQ. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

EMA vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Emera Inc (EMA) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMA achieves a 13.32% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 15.19% return.

EMA

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: 3.98%
• 6M: 14.24%
• YTD: 13.32%
• 1Y: 25.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQ

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: -3.17%
• 6M: 13.80%
• YTD: 15.19%
• 1Y: 27.28%
• 3Y*: 23.36%
• 5Y*: 15.26%
• 10Y*: 21.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMA vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EMA Emera Inc	13.32%	11.17%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	15.19%	18.28%

Correlation

The correlation between EMA and QQQ is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2025	-0.19

Return for Risk

EMA vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMA

EMA Risk / Return Rank: 89
EMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
EMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
EMA Omega Ratio Rank: 84
EMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
EMA Martin Ratio Rank: 92

QQQ

QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 53
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 50
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMA vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Emera Inc (EMA) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMA	QQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	1.47	+0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	2.00	+0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.26	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.26	2.29	+1.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.15	8.13	+3.02

EMA vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMA Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMA and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMA vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMA drawdown since its inception was -5.93%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMA and QQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMA	QQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.93%	-82.97%	+77.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.93%	-11.96%	+6.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.77%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.12%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.29%	+5.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.73%	-32.66%	+30.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.26%	3.36%	-1.10%

Volatility

EMA vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Emera Inc (EMA) is 5.13%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 7.53%. This indicates that EMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMA	QQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.13%	7.53%	-2.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.98%	15.52%	-4.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.08%	18.69%	-4.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.07%	22.81%	-8.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.07%	22.44%	-8.37%

Dividends

EMA vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

EMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, more than QQQ's 0.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMA Emera Inc	3.89%	2.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	0.43%	0.45%	0.56%	0.62%	0.80%	0.43%	0.55%	0.74%	0.91%	0.84%	1.06%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMA and QQQ in my portfolio?

EMA and QQQ have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMA or QQQ?

QQQ has higher volatility (7.53%) compared to EMA (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMA dropped -5.93% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.