PortfoliosLab logo
CNP vs. PM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CNP and PM is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CNP vs. PM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (CNP) and Philip Morris International Inc. (PM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CNP:

1.53

PM:

3.51

Sortino Ratio

CNP:

1.73

PM:

4.57

Omega Ratio

CNP:

1.24

PM:

1.69

Calmar Ratio

CNP:

1.43

PM:

7.81

Martin Ratio

CNP:

4.42

PM:

23.49

Ulcer Index

CNP:

6.09%

PM:

3.65%

Daily Std Dev

CNP:

20.89%

PM:

25.03%

Max Drawdown

CNP:

-88.40%

PM:

-42.87%

Current Drawdown

CNP:

-3.21%

PM:

0.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CNP:

$24.52B

PM:

$277.36B

EPS

CNP:

$1.48

PM:

$6.34

PE Ratio

CNP:

25.39

PM:

28.11

PEG Ratio

CNP:

2.52

PM:

1.31

PS Ratio

CNP:

2.74

PM:

7.23

PB Ratio

CNP:

2.24

PM:

0.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

CNP:

$8.94B

PM:

$38.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CNP:

$4.02B

PM:

$24.96B

EBITDA (TTM)

CNP:

$3.51B

PM:

$16.03B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNP achieves a 19.90% return, which is significantly lower than PM's 49.37% return. Over the past 10 years, CNP has underperformed PM with an annualized return of 10.11%, while PM has yielded a comparatively higher 13.46% annualized return.


CNP

YTD

19.90%

1M

-1.03%

6M

17.13%

1Y

30.79%

3Y*

9.13%

5Y*

20.42%

10Y*

10.11%

PM

YTD

49.37%

1M

4.67%

6M

39.06%

1Y

86.32%

3Y*

24.81%

5Y*

26.87%

10Y*

13.46%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CenterPoint Energy, Inc.

Philip Morris International Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CNP vs. PM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CNP is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CNP is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CNP is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CNP is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CNP is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CNP is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

PM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PM is 9999
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PM is 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PM is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PM is 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PM is 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PM is 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CNP vs. PM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (CNP) and Philip Morris International Inc. (PM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CNP Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the PM Sharpe Ratio of 3.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNP and PM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CNP vs. PM - Dividend Comparison

CNP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than PM's 3.00% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CNP
CenterPoint Energy, Inc.
2.26%2.55%2.70%2.33%2.33%3.42%4.22%3.94%3.78%4.19%5.40%4.06%
PM
Philip Morris International Inc.
3.00%4.40%5.46%4.98%5.16%5.73%5.43%6.73%3.99%4.50%4.60%4.76%

Drawdowns

CNP vs. PM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNP drawdown since its inception was -88.40%, which is greater than PM's maximum drawdown of -42.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNP and PM.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CNP vs. PM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (CNP) is 5.19%, while Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) has a volatility of 5.97%. This indicates that CNP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CNP vs. PM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CenterPoint Energy, Inc. and Philip Morris International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20212022202320242025
2.92B
9.30B
(CNP) Total Revenue
(PM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CNP vs. PM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CenterPoint Energy, Inc. and Philip Morris International Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
39.9%
67.3%
(CNP) Gross Margin
(PM) Gross Margin
CNP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CenterPoint Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.17B and revenue of 2.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.9%.

PM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Philip Morris International Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.26B and revenue of 9.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.3%.

CNP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CenterPoint Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 649.00M and revenue of 2.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.2%.

PM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Philip Morris International Inc. reported an operating income of 3.54B and revenue of 9.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.1%.

CNP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, CenterPoint Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 297.00M and revenue of 2.92B, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.

PM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Philip Morris International Inc. reported a net income of 2.69B and revenue of 9.30B, resulting in a net margin of 28.9%.