CNP vs. PM
CNP (CenterPoint Energy, Inc.) and PM (Philip Morris International Inc.) are both stocks. CNP operates in Utilities - Regulated Gas (Utilities), while PM operates in Tobacco (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, CNP returned 9.40%/yr vs 12.07%/yr for PM. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CNP vs. PM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNP achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly lower than PM's 21.02% return. Over the past 10 years, CNP has underperformed PM with an annualized return of 9.40%, while PM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.07% annualized return.
CNP
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -5.76%
- 6M
- 7.09%
- YTD
- 10.86%
- 1Y
- 10.76%
- 3Y*
- 15.48%
- 5Y*
- 13.38%
- 10Y*
- 9.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.99%
PM
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- 6M
- 8.18%
- YTD
- 21.02%
- 1Y
- 21.34%
- 3Y*
- 30.23%
- 5Y*
- 19.22%
- 10Y*
- 12.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $272.22M | $285.72M | $265.49M | |
| $1.12B | $967.33M | $937.11M |
CNP vs. PM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNP CenterPoint Energy, Inc. | 10.86% | 23.74% | 14.28% | -2.12% | 10.00% | 32.41% | -17.98% | 0.61% | 3.70% | 19.58% |
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 21.02% | 37.99% | 34.34% | -1.85% | 12.31% | 20.78% | 3.69% | 35.02% | -33.30% | 19.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNP and PM is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2008 | 0.36 |
Fundamentals
CNP:
$27.69B
PM:
$297.41B
CNP:
$1.69
PM:
$6.97
CNP:
24.81
PM:
27.38
CNP:
2.88
PM:
7.00
CNP:
$9.62B
PM:
$42.55B
CNP:
$5.20B
PM:
$28.72B
CNP:
$3.99B
PM:
$18.20B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNP vs. PM — Risk / Return Rank
CNP
PM
CNP vs. PM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (CNP) and Philip Morris International Inc. (PM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNP | PM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.14 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 1.11 | +0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.65 | 2.44 | +1.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNP vs. PM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNP drawdown since its inception was -89.94%, which is greater than PM's maximum drawdown of -42.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNP and PM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNP | PM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.94% | -42.87% | -47.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.67% | -18.54% | +11.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.14% | -20.64% | +2.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.81% | -22.78% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.80% | -42.87% | -16.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.66% | -4.67% | -1.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.26% | -9.97% | -22.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 8.42% | -5.47% |
Volatility
CNP vs. PM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (CNP) is 6.54%, while Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) has a volatility of 10.17%. This indicates that CNP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNP | PM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.54% | 10.17% | -3.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.38% | 22.50% | -9.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.60% | 27.90% | -11.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.76% | 23.19% | -3.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.92% | 24.64% | +1.28% |
Dividends
CNP vs. PM - Dividend Comparison
CNP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than PM's 3.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNP CenterPoint Energy, Inc. | 2.14% | 2.30% | 2.55% | 2.70% | 2.33% | 2.33% | 3.42% | 4.22% | 3.93% | 3.77% | 4.18% | 5.39% |
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 3.08% | 3.52% | 4.40% | 5.46% | 4.98% | 5.16% | 5.73% | 5.43% | 6.73% | 3.99% | 4.50% | 4.60% |
Financials
CNP vs. PM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CenterPoint Energy, Inc. and Philip Morris International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CNP vs. PM - Profitability Comparison
CNP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CenterPoint Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.87B and revenue of 2.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.9%.
PM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.66B and revenue of 11.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.4%.
CNP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CenterPoint Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 534.00M and revenue of 2.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.8%.
PM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported an operating income of 4.53B and revenue of 11.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.5%.
CNP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CenterPoint Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 244.00M and revenue of 2.15B, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.
PM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Philip Morris International Inc. reported a net income of 2.82B and revenue of 11.19B, resulting in a net margin of 25.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CNP and PM have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PM has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to CNP (6.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNP dropped -89.94% vs PM's -42.87%.
PM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CNP and PM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer