CNP vs. PM
Compare and contrast key facts about CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (CNP) and Philip Morris International Inc. (PM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CNP or PM.
Correlation
The correlation between CNP and PM is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CNP vs. PM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CNP:
1.85
PM:
3.58
CNP:
2.35
PM:
4.75
CNP:
1.33
PM:
1.73
CNP:
2.02
PM:
8.13
CNP:
6.31
PM:
24.76
CNP:
6.03%
PM:
3.60%
CNP:
20.51%
PM:
24.94%
CNP:
-88.40%
PM:
-42.87%
CNP:
-1.55%
PM:
-0.98%
Fundamentals
CNP:
$24.01B
PM:
$249.79B
CNP:
$1.58
PM:
$6.00
CNP:
23.28
PM:
26.75
CNP:
2.50
PM:
2.34
CNP:
2.78
PM:
6.59
CNP:
2.27
PM:
0.00
CNP:
$6.02B
PM:
$29.02B
CNP:
$2.85B
PM:
$18.69B
CNP:
$2.50B
PM:
$12.49B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNP achieves a 16.67% return, which is significantly lower than PM's 34.52% return. Over the past 10 years, CNP has underperformed PM with an annualized return of 9.64%, while PM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.10% annualized return.
CNP
16.67%
3.34%
23.77%
38.92%
20.61%
9.64%
PM
34.52%
3.97%
35.41%
87.36%
21.82%
12.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CNP vs. PM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CNP
PM
CNP vs. PM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (CNP) and Philip Morris International Inc. (PM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CNP vs. PM - Dividend Comparison
CNP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than PM's 3.33% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNP CenterPoint Energy, Inc. | 2.26% | 2.55% | 2.70% | 2.33% | 2.33% | 3.42% | 4.22% | 3.94% | 3.78% | 4.19% | 5.40% | 4.06% |
PM Philip Morris International Inc. | 3.33% | 4.40% | 5.46% | 4.98% | 5.16% | 5.73% | 5.43% | 6.73% | 3.99% | 4.50% | 4.60% | 4.76% |
Drawdowns
CNP vs. PM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNP drawdown since its inception was -88.40%, which is greater than PM's maximum drawdown of -42.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNP and PM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CNP vs. PM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (CNP) is 5.94%, while Philip Morris International Inc. (PM) has a volatility of 9.85%. This indicates that CNP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CNP vs. PM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CenterPoint Energy, Inc. and Philip Morris International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities