PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CNP vs. ATO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CNP and ATO is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

CNP vs. ATO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (CNP) and Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

2,000.00%3,000.00%4,000.00%5,000.00%6,000.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
2,196.73%
5,830.12%
CNP
ATO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CNP:

0.91

ATO:

1.78

Sortino Ratio

CNP:

1.28

ATO:

2.53

Omega Ratio

CNP:

1.18

ATO:

1.32

Calmar Ratio

CNP:

0.97

ATO:

2.69

Martin Ratio

CNP:

2.84

ATO:

8.72

Ulcer Index

CNP:

6.46%

ATO:

3.06%

Daily Std Dev

CNP:

20.08%

ATO:

14.99%

Max Drawdown

CNP:

-88.40%

ATO:

-51.94%

Current Drawdown

CNP:

-0.37%

ATO:

-7.75%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CNP:

$20.67B

ATO:

$21.97B

EPS

CNP:

$1.50

ATO:

$6.83

PE Ratio

CNP:

21.14

ATO:

20.70

PEG Ratio

CNP:

1.87

ATO:

3.36

Total Revenue (TTM)

CNP:

$8.56B

ATO:

$4.17B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CNP:

$3.06B

ATO:

$2.08B

EBITDA (TTM)

CNP:

$3.27B

ATO:

$2.09B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNP achieves a 17.19% return, which is significantly lower than ATO's 23.72% return. Over the past 10 years, CNP has underperformed ATO with an annualized return of 7.11%, while ATO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.56% annualized return.


CNP

YTD

17.19%

1M

3.76%

6M

6.50%

1Y

18.31%

5Y*

6.94%

10Y*

7.11%

ATO

YTD

23.72%

1M

-4.56%

6M

21.57%

1Y

26.06%

5Y*

7.15%

10Y*

12.56%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CNP vs. ATO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (CNP) and Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CNP, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.911.78
The chart of Sortino ratio for CNP, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.282.53
The chart of Omega ratio for CNP, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.181.32
The chart of Calmar ratio for CNP, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.972.69
The chart of Martin ratio for CNP, currently valued at 2.84, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.002.848.72
CNP
ATO

The current CNP Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the ATO Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNP and ATO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.91
1.78
CNP
ATO

Dividends

CNP vs. ATO - Dividend Comparison

CNP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than ATO's 2.35% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CNP
CenterPoint Energy, Inc.
2.49%2.70%2.33%2.33%3.42%4.22%3.94%3.78%4.19%5.40%4.06%3.57%
ATO
Atmos Energy Corporation
2.35%2.61%2.48%2.44%2.46%1.92%2.14%2.14%2.31%2.52%2.69%3.13%

Drawdowns

CNP vs. ATO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNP drawdown since its inception was -88.40%, which is greater than ATO's maximum drawdown of -51.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNP and ATO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-0.37%
-7.75%
CNP
ATO

Volatility

CNP vs. ATO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (CNP) is 4.92%, while Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) has a volatility of 5.67%. This indicates that CNP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
4.92%
5.67%
CNP
ATO

Financials

CNP vs. ATO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CenterPoint Energy, Inc. and Atmos Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab