PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CNP vs. ATO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CNPATO
YTD Return3.38%3.11%
1Y Return0.33%8.55%
3Y Return (Ann)8.95%7.39%
5Y Return (Ann)1.78%5.45%
10Y Return (Ann)5.70%11.64%
Sharpe Ratio-0.090.38
Daily Std Dev18.49%16.94%
Max Drawdown-88.40%-51.94%
Current Drawdown-7.75%-2.64%

Fundamentals


CNPATO
Market Cap$18.26B$17.64B
EPS$1.37$6.26
PE Ratio21.0618.68
PEG Ratio2.092.74
Revenue (TTM)$8.70B$3.95B
Gross Profit (TTM)$3.57B$2.06B
EBITDA (TTM)$2.97B$1.78B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between CNP and ATO is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CNP vs. ATO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CNP achieves a 3.38% return, which is significantly higher than ATO's 3.11% return. Over the past 10 years, CNP has underperformed ATO with an annualized return of 5.70%, while ATO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.64% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


3,000.00%4,000.00%5,000.00%6,000.00%7,000.00%8,000.00%9,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
3,792.72%
8,677.93%
CNP
ATO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CenterPoint Energy, Inc.

Atmos Energy Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CNP vs. ATO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (CNP) and Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNP
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CNP, currently valued at -0.09, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.09
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CNP, currently valued at -0.00, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.00
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CNP, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.00
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CNP, currently valued at -0.09, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.09
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CNP, currently valued at -0.21, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.21
ATO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ATO, currently valued at 0.38, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.38
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ATO, currently valued at 0.66, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.66
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ATO, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.08
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ATO, currently valued at 0.38, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.38
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ATO, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.94

CNP vs. ATO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNP Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the ATO Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CNP and ATO.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.40-0.200.000.200.400.60December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.09
0.38
CNP
ATO

Dividends

CNP vs. ATO - Dividend Comparison

CNP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, more than ATO's 2.60% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CNP
CenterPoint Energy, Inc.
2.66%2.70%2.33%2.33%3.42%4.22%3.93%3.77%4.18%5.39%4.05%3.58%
ATO
Atmos Energy Corporation
2.60%2.61%2.48%2.44%2.46%1.92%2.14%2.14%2.31%2.52%2.69%3.13%

Drawdowns

CNP vs. ATO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNP drawdown since its inception was -88.40%, which is greater than ATO's maximum drawdown of -51.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNP and ATO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-7.75%
-2.64%
CNP
ATO

Volatility

CNP vs. ATO - Volatility Comparison

CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (CNP) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) at 4.47%. This indicates that CNP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
5.52%
4.47%
CNP
ATO

Financials

CNP vs. ATO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CenterPoint Energy, Inc. and Atmos Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items