ELVN vs. FLTR
ELVN (Enliven Therapeutics Inc.) is a stock, while FLTR (VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) is Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Over the past 5 years, ELVN returned 2.00%/yr vs 4.49%/yr for FLTR. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ELVN vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ELVN achieves a 133.96% return, which is significantly higher than FLTR's 1.91% return.
ELVN
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- -13.41%
- YTD
- 133.96%
- 6M
- 71.57%
- 1Y
- 64.82%
- 3Y*
- 18.69%
- 5Y*
- 2.00%
- 10Y*
- —
FLTR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 2.40%
- 1Y
- 5.30%
- 3Y*
- 6.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.49%
- 10Y*
- 3.51%
ELVN vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELVN Enliven Therapeutics Inc. | 133.96% | -31.56% | 62.57% | -15.40% | 81.78% | -89.80% | 47.00% |
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 1.91% | 5.22% | 7.38% | 7.41% | 0.74% | 0.55% | 11.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between ELVN and FLTR is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2020 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ELVN vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank
ELVN
FLTR
ELVN vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enliven Therapeutics Inc. (ELVN) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ELVN | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 6.77 | -5.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | 12.78 | -10.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 3.15 | -1.93 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 16.96 | -15.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.61 | 101.23 | -96.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ELVN | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 6.77 | -5.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 2.11 | -2.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 0.53 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
ELVN vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ELVN drawdown since its inception was -98.20%, which is greater than FLTR's maximum drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELVN and FLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ELVN | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.20% | -17.84% | -80.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.84% | -0.31% | -36.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.05% | -1.93% | -54.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.05% | -3.06% | -85.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -83.58% | -0.04% | -83.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.22% | -0.67% | -83.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.09% | 0.05% | +14.04% |
Volatility
ELVN vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
Enliven Therapeutics Inc. (ELVN) has a higher volatility of 14.50% compared to VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) at 0.25%. This indicates that ELVN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ELVN | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.50% | 0.25% | +14.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.61% | 0.62% | +59.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.50% | 0.79% | +81.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.81% | 2.13% | +83.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 87.95% | 5.00% | +82.95% |
Dividends
ELVN vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
ELVN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ELVN Enliven Therapeutics Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 4.73% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ELVN and FLTR have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ELVN has higher volatility (14.50%) compared to FLTR (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ELVN dropped -98.20% vs FLTR's -17.84%.
FLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.77 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ELVN and FLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer