ELBM vs. CRML

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ELBM (Electra Battery Materials Corp) and CRML (Critical Metals Corp) are both stocks. Both operate in the Other Industrial Metals & Mining industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past year, ELBM returned -30.82% vs 656.55% for CRML. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ELBM vs. CRML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Electra Battery Materials Corp (ELBM) and Critical Metals Corp (CRML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ELBM achieves a -12.50% return, which is significantly lower than CRML's 58.07% return.

ELBM

• 1D: 5.45%
• 1M: 6.87%
• YTD: -12.50%
• 6M: -32.69%
• 1Y: -30.82%
• 3Y*: -47.94%
• 5Y*: -47.60%
• 10Y*: —

CRML

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: -17.58%
• YTD: 58.07%
• 6M: 10.36%
• 1Y: 656.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ELBM vs. CRML - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ELBM Electra Battery Materials Corp	-12.50%	-56.86%	-18.52%
CRML Critical Metals Corp	58.07%	2.21%	-69.82%

Correlation

The correlation between ELBM and CRML is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2024	0.24

The correlation between ELBM and CRML shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS ELBM : -$1.51 CRML : -$0.53
Total Revenue (TTM) ELBM : $0.00 CRML : $560.62K
Gross Profit (TTM) ELBM : -$32.08K CRML : $560.62K
EBITDA (TTM) ELBM : -$121.72M CRML : -$47.47M

Return for Risk

ELBM vs. CRML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ELBM

ELBM Risk / Return Rank: 53
ELBM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
ELBM Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
ELBM Omega Ratio Rank: 84
ELBM Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
ELBM Martin Ratio Rank: 33

CRML

CRML Risk / Return Rank: 94
CRML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CRML Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CRML Omega Ratio Rank: 90
CRML Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CRML Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ELBM vs. CRML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Electra Battery Materials Corp (ELBM) and Critical Metals Corp (CRML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ELBM	CRML	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.09	3.78	-3.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	3.93	-1.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.44	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.33	8.52	-8.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.44	12.83	-13.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ELBM vs. CRML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ELBM Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the CRML Sharpe Ratio of 3.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ELBM and CRML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ELBM	CRML	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09	3.78	-3.87
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.27	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.25	-0.17	-0.08

Drawdowns

ELBM vs. CRML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ELBM drawdown since its inception was -99.43%, which is greater than CRML's maximum drawdown of -93.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELBM and CRML.

Drawdown Indicators

	ELBM	CRML	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.43%	-93.91%	-5.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-92.84%	-77.74%	-15.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-94.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-97.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.21%	-63.40%	-35.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-81.85%	-68.23%	-13.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	70.71%	51.57%	+19.14%

Volatility

ELBM vs. CRML - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Electra Battery Materials Corp (ELBM) is 19.83%, while Critical Metals Corp (CRML) has a volatility of 23.16%. This indicates that ELBM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ELBM	CRML	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.83%	23.16%	-3.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.11%	101.76%	-48.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	348.27%	175.33%	+172.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	175.09%	157.17%	+17.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	144.18%	157.17%	-12.99%

Dividends

ELBM vs. CRML - Dividend Comparison

Neither ELBM nor CRML has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ELBM and CRML in my portfolio?

ELBM and CRML have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ELBM or CRML?

CRML has higher volatility (23.16%) compared to ELBM (19.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ELBM dropped -99.43% vs CRML's -93.91%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.78 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.