EL vs. GIS
EL (The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.) and GIS (General Mills, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — EL in Household & Personal Products, GIS in Packaged Foods. Over the past 10 years, EL returned 1.09%/yr vs -2.63%/yr for GIS. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EL vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EL achieves a -13.76% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -23.47% return. Over the past 10 years, EL has outperformed GIS with an annualized return of 1.09%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively lower -2.63% annualized return.
EL
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- 9.61%
- YTD
- -13.76%
- 6M
- -13.25%
- 1Y
- 30.01%
- 3Y*
- -19.92%
- 5Y*
- -20.28%
- 10Y*
- 1.09%
GIS
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- -23.47%
- 6M
- -23.78%
- 1Y
- -33.38%
- 3Y*
- -21.38%
- 5Y*
- -7.83%
- 10Y*
- -2.63%
EL vs. GIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EL The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. | -13.76% | 42.13% | -47.59% | -40.13% | -32.31% | 40.03% | 29.77% | 60.34% | 3.38% | 68.68% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -23.47% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between EL and GIS is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 1995 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
EL:
$32.77B
GIS:
$18.72B
EL:
-$0.68
GIS:
$4.08
EL:
2.20
GIS:
1.02
EL:
8.21
GIS:
2.00
EL:
$14.84B
GIS:
$18.37B
EL:
$11.09B
GIS:
$4.70B
EL:
$1.30B
GIS:
$3.03B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EL vs. GIS — Risk / Return Rank
EL
GIS
EL vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EL | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.77 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.69 | -0.91 | +1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.66 | -1.86 | +3.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EL vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EL drawdown since its inception was -85.82%, which is greater than GIS's maximum drawdown of -59.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EL and GIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EL | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.82% | -59.63% | -26.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.62% | -36.85% | -6.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.55% | -55.32% | -19.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.82% | -59.63% | -26.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.82% | -59.63% | -26.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.09% | -56.70% | -17.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.74% | -10.28% | -10.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.12% | 19.06% | -0.94% |
Volatility
EL vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) has a higher volatility of 15.86% compared to General Mills, Inc. (GIS) at 6.25%. This indicates that EL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EL | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.86% | 6.25% | +9.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.87% | 18.81% | +20.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.31% | 23.96% | +24.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.35% | 21.14% | +22.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.60% | 22.10% | +14.50% |
Dividends
EL vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
EL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than GIS's 7.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EL The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. | 1.56% | 1.34% | 3.11% | 1.81% | 0.99% | 0.59% | 0.56% | 0.86% | 1.21% | 1.10% | 1.62% | 1.16% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 7.07% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
Financials
EL vs. GIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EL vs. GIS - Profitability Comparison
EL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.84B and revenue of 3.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.4%.
GIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
EL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. reported an operating income of 249.00M and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
GIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of 524.60M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.
EL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. reported a net income of 89.00M and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.
GIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of 303.10M and revenue of 4.44B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EL and GIS have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EL has higher volatility (15.86%) compared to GIS (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EL dropped -85.82% vs GIS's -59.63%.
EL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs -1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EL and GIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer