PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EL vs. LRLCY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EL vs. LRLCY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) and L'Oréal S.A. (LRLCY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EL achieves a -19.32% return, which is significantly lower than LRLCY's 5.98% return. Over the past 10 years, EL has underperformed LRLCY with an annualized return of 0.22%, while LRLCY has yielded a comparatively higher 10.76% annualized return.


EL

1D
-1.15%
1M
0.23%
6M
-26.71%
YTD
-19.32%
1Y
-6.49%
3Y*
-20.27%
5Y*
-22.98%
10Y*
0.22%
ALL TIME*
9.25%

LRLCY

1D
-1.57%
1M
0.47%
6M
-0.98%
YTD
5.98%
1Y
4.42%
3Y*
0.86%
5Y*
1.06%
10Y*
10.76%
ALL TIME*
9.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$175.36M$184.14M$274.38M
$12.95M$14.42M$26.50M

EL vs. LRLCY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EL
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
-19.32%42.13%-47.59%-40.13%-32.31%40.03%29.77%60.34%3.38%68.68%
LRLCY
L'Oréal S.A.
5.98%23.82%-28.09%41.40%-24.25%26.75%31.11%31.01%5.07%26.15%

Correlation

The correlation between EL and LRLCY is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007

0.44

The correlation between EL and LRLCY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EL:

$30.34B

LRLCY:

$237.21B

EPS

EL:

-$0.68

LRLCY:

€4.66

PS Ratio

EL:

2.06

LRLCY:

2.31

PB Ratio

EL:

7.68

LRLCY:

6.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

EL:

$14.84B

LRLCY:

€89.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EL:

$11.09B

LRLCY:

€67.48B

EBITDA (TTM)

EL:

$1.30B

LRLCY:

€21.39B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EL vs. LRLCY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EL
EL Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
EL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
EL Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
EL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
EL Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

LRLCY
LRLCY Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
LRLCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRLCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRLCY Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
LRLCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRLCY Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EL vs. LRLCY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) and L'Oréal S.A. (LRLCY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ELLRLCYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.04

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

0.15

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.42

0.30

-0.72

EL vs. LRLCY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EL Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the LRLCY Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EL and LRLCY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EL vs. LRLCY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EL drawdown since its inception was -85.82%, which is greater than LRLCY's maximum drawdown of -59.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EL and LRLCY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ELLRLCYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.82%

-59.55%

-26.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.62%

-16.83%

-26.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.59%

-32.42%

-37.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.82%

-39.05%

-46.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.82%

-39.05%

-46.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-75.76%

-6.96%

-68.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.98%

-12.13%

-8.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.14%

8.42%

+12.72%

Volatility

EL vs. LRLCY - Volatility Comparison

The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) has a higher volatility of 7.86% compared to L'Oréal S.A. (LRLCY) at 7.05%. This indicates that EL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LRLCY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ELLRLCYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.86%

7.05%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.23%

22.16%

+17.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.22%

27.53%

+18.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.57%

27.13%

+16.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.71%

25.07%

+11.64%

Dividends

EL vs. LRLCY - Dividend Comparison

EL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than LRLCY's 1.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EL
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.
1.67%1.34%3.11%1.81%0.99%0.59%0.56%0.86%1.21%1.10%1.62%1.16%
LRLCY
L'Oréal S.A.
1.84%1.79%2.02%1.29%1.53%1.00%1.14%1.48%1.91%3.34%3.87%1.87%

Financials

EL vs. LRLCY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. and L'Oréal S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

EL vs. LRLCY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. and L'Oréal S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

EL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.84B and revenue of 3.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.4%.

LRLCY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, L'Oréal S.A. reported a gross profit of 18.13B and revenue of 24.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.8%.

EL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. reported an operating income of 249.00M and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.

LRLCY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, L'Oréal S.A. reported an operating income of 5.16B and revenue of 24.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.3%.

EL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. reported a net income of 89.00M and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.

LRLCY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, L'Oréal S.A. reported a net income of 3.62B and revenue of 24.25B, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EL and LRLCY have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EL has higher volatility (7.86%) compared to LRLCY (7.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EL dropped -85.82% vs LRLCY's -59.55%.

LRLCY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EL and LRLCY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer