EKWAX vs. WEACX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

EKWAX (Allspring Precious Metals Fund) and WEACX (Allspring Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - EKWAX is a Precious Metals fund managed by Allspring Global Investments, while WEACX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Allspring Global Investments. Over the past 5 years, EKWAX returned 21.73%/yr vs 9.11%/yr for WEACX. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EKWAX charges 1.09%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for WEACX.

Performance

EKWAX vs. WEACX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) and Allspring Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund (WEACX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EKWAX achieves a -15.29% return, which is significantly lower than WEACX's 10.96% return.

EKWAX

• 1D: -3.75%
• 1M: -15.02%
• 6M: -22.55%
• YTD: -15.29%
• 1Y: 43.75%
• 3Y*: 38.13%
• 5Y*: 21.73%
• 10Y*: 10.92%

WEACX

• 1D: -1.09%
• 1M: -0.53%
• 6M: 7.55%
• YTD: 10.96%
• 1Y: 20.88%
• 3Y*: 16.78%
• 5Y*: 9.11%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EKWAX vs. WEACX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EKWAX Allspring Precious Metals Fund	-15.29%	163.65%	21.28%	8.83%	-7.75%	-11.00%	24.40%	40.35%	-12.83%	9.66%
WEACX Allspring Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund	10.96%	20.01%	15.43%	18.33%	-19.88%	19.02%	22.18%	23.49%	-10.18%	22.33%

Correlation

The correlation between EKWAX and WEACX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.27

Over the past year, EKWAX and WEACX have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

EKWAX vs. WEACX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EKWAX

EKWAX Risk / Return Rank: 16
EKWAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
EKWAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
EKWAX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
EKWAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
EKWAX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

WEACX

WEACX Risk / Return Rank: 46
WEACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
WEACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
WEACX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
WEACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
WEACX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EKWAX vs. WEACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) and Allspring Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund (WEACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EKWAX	WEACX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	1.50	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.36	2.06	-0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.27	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.14	2.41	-1.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.71	8.86	-6.15

EKWAX vs. WEACX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EKWAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the WEACX Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EKWAX and WEACX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EKWAX vs. WEACX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EKWAX drawdown since its inception was -76.76%, which is greater than WEACX's maximum drawdown of -27.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKWAX and WEACX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EKWAX	WEACX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.76%	-27.06%	-49.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.00%	-9.03%	-27.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.00%	-14.62%	-22.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.79%	-27.06%	-15.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.00%	-2.62%	-34.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.76%	-5.72%	-27.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.55%	2.45%	+13.10%

Volatility

EKWAX vs. WEACX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) has a higher volatility of 12.50% compared to Allspring Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund (WEACX) at 4.65%. This indicates that EKWAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WEACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EKWAX	WEACX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.50%	4.65%	+7.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.01%	11.71%	+27.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.44%	14.52%	+31.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.29%	15.36%	+18.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.39%	14.94%	+18.45%

EKWAX vs. WEACX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EKWAX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is lower than WEACX's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

EKWAX vs. WEACX - Dividend Comparison

EKWAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than WEACX's 11.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EKWAX Allspring Precious Metals Fund	1.41%	1.19%	0.84%	0.00%	2.01%	1.35%	1.45%	0.11%	0.00%	1.34%	1.11%
WEACX Allspring Spectrum Aggressive Growth Fund	11.04%	12.24%	7.24%	0.00%	4.56%	14.17%	11.86%	0.43%	20.98%	17.50%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EKWAX and WEACX in my portfolio?

EKWAX and WEACX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EKWAX or WEACX?

EKWAX has higher volatility (12.50%) compared to WEACX (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EKWAX dropped -76.76% vs WEACX's -27.06%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WEACX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.