EKBAX vs. AOA
Compare and contrast key facts about Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA).
EKBAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jan 19, 1998. AOA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008.
Performance
EKBAX vs. AOA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EKBAX vs. AOA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EKBAX Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund | 7.46% | 21.87% | 21.75% | 22.23% | -13.47% | 19.61% | 12.66% | 32.99% | -5.55% | 14.43% |
AOA iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF | -0.59% | 19.59% | 13.55% | 18.27% | -16.23% | 15.42% | 12.82% | 22.60% | -7.86% | 20.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EKBAX achieves a 7.46% return, which is significantly higher than AOA's -0.59% return. Over the past 10 years, EKBAX has outperformed AOA with an annualized return of 14.11%, while AOA has yielded a comparatively lower 9.69% annualized return.
EKBAX
- 1D
- 2.78%
- 1M
- -4.52%
- YTD
- 7.46%
- 6M
- 13.50%
- 1Y
- 39.99%
- 3Y*
- 22.93%
- 5Y*
- 14.35%
- 10Y*
- 14.11%
AOA
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -4.11%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 18.69%
- 3Y*
- 14.47%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- 9.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EKBAX vs. AOA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EKBAX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than AOA's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EKBAX vs. AOA — Risk / Return Rank
EKBAX
AOA
EKBAX vs. AOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EKBAX | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.96 | 1.35 | +0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.56 | 1.97 | +0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.29 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 1.98 | +1.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.01 | 8.82 | +6.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EKBAX | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 1.35 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.62 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.72 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.65 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between EKBAX and AOA is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EKBAX vs. AOA - Dividend Comparison
EKBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.95%, more than AOA's 2.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EKBAX Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund | 8.95% | 9.61% | 5.28% | 6.16% | 12.50% | 6.89% | 2.03% | 9.49% | 7.14% | 6.20% | 10.05% | 11.47% |
AOA iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF | 2.19% | 2.18% | 2.30% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 1.67% | 1.71% | 2.50% | 2.37% | 5.09% | 2.26% | 2.15% |
Drawdowns
EKBAX vs. AOA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EKBAX drawdown since its inception was -55.64%, which is greater than AOA's maximum drawdown of -28.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EKBAX and AOA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EKBAX | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.64% | -28.38% | -27.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.29% | -9.62% | -3.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.84% | -23.62% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.33% | -28.38% | -3.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.75% | -5.18% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.03% | -4.08% | -3.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 2.16% | +0.56% |
Volatility
EKBAX vs. AOA - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX) has a higher volatility of 6.47% compared to iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) at 5.28%. This indicates that EKBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EKBAX | AOA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.47% | 5.28% | +1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.05% | 8.34% | +4.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.88% | 13.87% | +7.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.89% | 12.92% | +4.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.42% | 13.51% | +3.91% |