AOA vs. AOM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM).
AOA and AOM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AOA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008. AOM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Moderate. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008. Both AOA and AOM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AOA or AOM.
Correlation
The correlation between AOA and AOM is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
AOA vs. AOM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AOA:
1.61
AOM:
1.47
AOA:
2.22
AOM:
2.09
AOA:
1.29
AOM:
1.27
AOA:
2.52
AOM:
1.56
AOA:
10.04
AOM:
8.56
AOA:
1.56%
AOM:
1.09%
AOA:
9.73%
AOM:
6.30%
AOA:
-28.38%
AOM:
-19.96%
AOA:
-2.97%
AOM:
-2.22%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOA achieves a 13.82% return, which is significantly higher than AOM's 8.17% return. Over the past 10 years, AOA has outperformed AOM with an annualized return of 7.73%, while AOM has yielded a comparatively lower 4.69% annualized return.
AOA
13.82%
-0.44%
4.76%
14.61%
8.09%
7.73%
AOM
8.17%
0.02%
3.52%
8.63%
4.19%
4.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AOA vs. AOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AOA and AOM have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AOA vs. AOM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AOA vs. AOM - Dividend Comparison
AOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, less than AOM's 4.12% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOA iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF | 2.29% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 1.67% | 1.71% | 2.50% | 2.37% | 5.09% | 2.02% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 1.84% |
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF | 3.09% | 2.79% | 2.27% | 1.56% | 2.02% | 2.66% | 2.53% | 3.31% | 2.14% | 1.98% | 2.08% | 1.87% |
Drawdowns
AOA vs. AOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOA drawdown since its inception was -28.38%, which is greater than AOM's maximum drawdown of -19.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOA and AOM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AOA vs. AOM - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) has a higher volatility of 2.88% compared to iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) at 1.94%. This indicates that AOA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.