AOA vs. VASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) and Vanguard LifeStrategy Growth Fund (VASGX).
AOA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008. VASGX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Sep 30, 1994.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AOA or VASGX.
Correlation
The correlation between AOA and VASGX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
AOA vs. VASGX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AOA:
1.61
VASGX:
1.54
AOA:
2.22
VASGX:
2.13
AOA:
1.29
VASGX:
1.28
AOA:
2.52
VASGX:
2.19
AOA:
10.04
VASGX:
9.62
AOA:
1.56%
VASGX:
1.54%
AOA:
9.73%
VASGX:
9.64%
AOA:
-28.38%
VASGX:
-51.16%
AOA:
-2.97%
VASGX:
-3.14%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AOA having a 13.82% return and VASGX slightly lower at 13.58%. Over the past 10 years, AOA has outperformed VASGX with an annualized return of 7.73%, while VASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.96% annualized return.
AOA
13.82%
-0.44%
4.76%
14.61%
8.09%
7.73%
VASGX
13.58%
-0.77%
5.23%
13.57%
7.21%
6.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AOA vs. VASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VASGX's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AOA vs. VASGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) and Vanguard LifeStrategy Growth Fund (VASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AOA vs. VASGX - Dividend Comparison
AOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, more than VASGX's 2.19% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOA iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF | 2.29% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 1.67% | 1.71% | 2.50% | 2.37% | 5.09% | 2.02% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 1.84% |
VASGX Vanguard LifeStrategy Growth Fund | 2.19% | 2.34% | 2.10% | 1.87% | 1.68% | 2.32% | 2.56% | 2.09% | 2.22% | 2.20% | 2.10% | 1.92% |
Drawdowns
AOA vs. VASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOA drawdown since its inception was -28.38%, smaller than the maximum VASGX drawdown of -51.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOA and VASGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AOA vs. VASGX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) and Vanguard LifeStrategy Growth Fund (VASGX) have volatilities of 2.88% and 2.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.