AOA vs. AOR
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) and iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR).
AOA and AOR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AOA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008. AOR is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Growth Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008. Both AOA and AOR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AOA or AOR.
Key characteristics
| AOA | AOR | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 7.39% | 6.68% |
| 1Y Return | 2.16% | 1.41% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 5.64% | 4.53% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 7.19% | 5.81% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.10 | 0.06 |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.98% | 13.68% |
| Max Drawdown | -28.38% | -24.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOA and AOR is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
AOA vs. AOR - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, AOA achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly higher than AOR's 6.68% return. Over the past 10 years, AOA has outperformed AOR with an annualized return of 7.19%, while AOR has yielded a comparatively lower 5.81% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
AOA vs. AOR - Dividend Comparison
AOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than AOR's 2.40% yield.
| TTM | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOA iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF | 2.25% | 2.11% | 1.71% | 1.78% | 2.66% | 2.58% | 5.67% | 2.65% | 2.58% | 2.67% | 2.31% | 2.78% |
AOR iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF | 2.40% | 2.13% | 1.68% | 1.97% | 2.72% | 2.72% | 5.05% | 2.53% | 2.53% | 2.57% | 2.40% | 2.65% |
AOA vs. AOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOA vs. AOR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) and iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Ulcer Index | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOA iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF | 0.10 | ||||
AOR iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF | 0.06 |
AOA vs. AOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOA drawdown for the period was -17.25%, roughly equal to the maximum AOR drawdown of -16.16%. The drawdown chart below compares losses from any high point along the way for AOA and AOR
AOA vs. AOR - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) has a higher volatility of 2.77% compared to iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) at 2.49%. This indicates that AOA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.