EIS vs. IPOS
EIS (iShares MSCI Israel ETF) and IPOS (Renaissance International IPO ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - EIS tracks the MSCI Israel Capped Investable Market Index (Net) while IPOS tracks the Renaissance International IPO Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EIS returned 11.97%/yr vs 3.00%/yr for IPOS. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EIS charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for IPOS.
Performance
EIS vs. IPOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIS achieves a 18.19% return, which is significantly lower than IPOS's 40.15% return. Over the past 10 years, EIS has outperformed IPOS with an annualized return of 11.97%, while IPOS has yielded a comparatively lower 3.00% annualized return.
EIS
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- 18.19%
- 6M
- 22.47%
- 1Y
- 54.91%
- 3Y*
- 37.61%
- 5Y*
- 15.32%
- 10Y*
- 11.97%
IPOS
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 10.58%
- YTD
- 40.15%
- 6M
- 44.26%
- 1Y
- 65.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.28%
- 5Y*
- -7.69%
- 10Y*
- 3.00%
EIS vs. IPOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIS iShares MSCI Israel ETF | 18.19% | 45.11% | 34.50% | 5.48% | -27.05% | 22.83% | 12.01% | 20.93% | -4.84% | 12.77% |
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 40.15% | 39.93% | -12.34% | -16.49% | -33.46% | -30.62% | 50.71% | 30.93% | -22.33% | 36.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between EIS and IPOS is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2014 | 0.40 |
The correlation between EIS and IPOS shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EIS vs. IPOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EIS
IPOS
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Financial Services
EIS
IPOS
Technology
EIS
IPOS
Industrials
EIS
IPOS
Healthcare
EIS
IPOS
Real Estate
EIS
IPOS
-
Utilities
EIS
IPOS
Communication Services
EIS
IPOS
Consumer Cyclical
EIS
IPOS
Consumer Defensive
EIS
IPOS
Energy
EIS
IPOS
Basic Materials
EIS
IPOS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EIS vs. IPOS — Risk / Return Rank
EIS
IPOS
EIS vs. IPOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EIS | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.41 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.45 | 3.83 | +0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.54 | 11.58 | +4.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EIS | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | 2.24 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | -0.28 | +0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.12 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.09 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
EIS vs. IPOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIS drawdown since its inception was -51.94%, smaller than the maximum IPOS drawdown of -73.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIS and IPOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIS | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.94% | -73.09% | +21.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.40% | -17.17% | +4.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.10% | -34.08% | +9.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.88% | -69.93% | +28.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.88% | -73.09% | +31.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.56% | -40.44% | +34.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.90% | -31.99% | +18.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 5.67% | -2.34% |
Volatility
EIS vs. IPOS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS) is 6.64%, while Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a volatility of 12.05%. This indicates that EIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EIS | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.64% | 12.05% | -5.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.05% | 26.45% | -10.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.56% | 29.41% | -6.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.81% | 27.19% | -5.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.08% | 24.13% | -3.05% |
EIS vs. IPOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than IPOS's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
EIS vs. IPOS - Dividend Comparison
EIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, more than IPOS's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIS iShares MSCI Israel ETF | 1.22% | 1.44% | 1.38% | 1.39% | 1.66% | 1.04% | 0.16% | 2.06% | 0.87% | 2.02% | 1.78% | 2.55% |
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 0.68% | 1.04% | 0.93% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.89% | 1.12% | 0.87% | 1.73% | 1.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EIS and IPOS have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IPOS has higher volatility (12.05%) compared to EIS (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIS dropped -51.94% vs IPOS's -73.09%.
On 10-year performance, EIS leads with 11.97% vs 3.00% for IPOS. On fees, EIS is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, EIS has been the lower-risk option at 6.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EIS has performed better with a 11.97% return vs 3.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EIS is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.
EIS has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.68% for IPOS.
EIS tracks MSCI Israel Capped Investable Market Index (Net), while IPOS tracks Renaissance International IPO Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Renaissance Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EIS and 0.80% for IPOS.
EIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EIS and IPOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer