PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIS vs. IPOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIS vs. IPOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIS achieves a 18.19% return, which is significantly lower than IPOS's 40.15% return. Over the past 10 years, EIS has outperformed IPOS with an annualized return of 11.97%, while IPOS has yielded a comparatively lower 3.00% annualized return.


EIS

1D
-1.92%
1M
-2.12%
YTD
18.19%
6M
22.47%
1Y
54.91%
3Y*
37.61%
5Y*
15.32%
10Y*
11.97%

IPOS

1D
0.43%
1M
10.58%
YTD
40.15%
6M
44.26%
1Y
65.50%
3Y*
15.28%
5Y*
-7.69%
10Y*
3.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIS vs. IPOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIS
iShares MSCI Israel ETF
18.19%45.11%34.50%5.48%-27.05%22.83%12.01%20.93%-4.84%12.77%
IPOS
Renaissance International IPO ETF
40.15%39.93%-12.34%-16.49%-33.46%-30.62%50.71%30.93%-22.33%36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between EIS and IPOS is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2014

0.40

The correlation between EIS and IPOS shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EIS vs. IPOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EIS
IPOS

Financial Services

34.6%
9.6%

Technology

17.8%
42.0%

Industrials

10.9%
15.0%

Healthcare

9.8%
16.2%

Real Estate

9.1%

-

Utilities

6.6%
3.1%

Communication Services

2.7%
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

2.5%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
4.7%

Energy

2.0%
4.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
5.3%

Financial Services

EIS
34.6%
IPOS
9.6%

Technology

EIS
17.8%
IPOS
42.0%

Industrials

EIS
10.9%
IPOS
15.0%

Healthcare

EIS
9.8%
IPOS
16.2%

Real Estate

EIS
9.1%
IPOS

-

Utilities

EIS
6.6%
IPOS
3.1%

Communication Services

EIS
2.7%
IPOS
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EIS
2.5%
IPOS
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

EIS
2.3%
IPOS
4.7%

Energy

EIS
2.0%
IPOS
4.9%

Basic Materials

EIS
1.8%
IPOS
5.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIS vs. IPOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIS
EIS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
EIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIS Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

IPOS
IPOS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IPOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPOS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IPOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPOS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIS vs. IPOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EISIPOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.41

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.45

3.83

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.54

11.58

+4.97

EIS vs. IPOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIS Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the IPOS Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIS and IPOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EISIPOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

2.24

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

-0.28

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.12

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.09

+0.24

Drawdowns

EIS vs. IPOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIS drawdown since its inception was -51.94%, smaller than the maximum IPOS drawdown of -73.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIS and IPOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EISIPOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.94%

-73.09%

+21.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.40%

-17.17%

+4.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.10%

-34.08%

+9.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.88%

-69.93%

+28.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.88%

-73.09%

+31.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.56%

-40.44%

+34.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.90%

-31.99%

+18.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

5.67%

-2.34%

Volatility

EIS vs. IPOS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Israel ETF (EIS) is 6.64%, while Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a volatility of 12.05%. This indicates that EIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EISIPOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.64%

12.05%

-5.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.05%

26.45%

-10.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.56%

29.41%

-6.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.81%

27.19%

-5.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.08%

24.13%

-3.05%

EIS vs. IPOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than IPOS's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIS vs. IPOS - Dividend Comparison

EIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, more than IPOS's 0.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIS
iShares MSCI Israel ETF
1.22%1.44%1.38%1.39%1.66%1.04%0.16%2.06%0.87%2.02%1.78%2.55%
IPOS
Renaissance International IPO ETF
0.68%1.04%0.93%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.25%0.89%1.12%0.87%1.73%1.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIS and IPOS have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IPOS has higher volatility (12.05%) compared to EIS (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIS dropped -51.94% vs IPOS's -73.09%.

On 10-year performance, EIS leads with 11.97% vs 3.00% for IPOS. On fees, EIS is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, EIS has been the lower-risk option at 6.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EIS has performed better with a 11.97% return vs 3.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EIS is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.

EIS has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.68% for IPOS.

EIS tracks MSCI Israel Capped Investable Market Index (Net), while IPOS tracks Renaissance International IPO Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Renaissance Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EIS and 0.80% for IPOS.

EIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIS and IPOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer