EIFGX vs. EHSTX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

EIFGX (Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund) and EHSTX (Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund) are both mutual funds - EIFGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Eaton Vance, while EHSTX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Eaton Vance. Over the past 10 years, EIFGX returned 17.59%/yr vs 10.93%/yr for EHSTX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EIFGX charges 0.76%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for EHSTX.

Performance

EIFGX vs. EHSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund (EIFGX) and Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIFGX achieves a 8.24% return, which is significantly lower than EHSTX's 12.69% return. Over the past 10 years, EIFGX has outperformed EHSTX with an annualized return of 17.59%, while EHSTX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.93% annualized return.

EIFGX

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 2.82%
• YTD: 8.24%
• 6M: 7.15%
• 1Y: 21.85%
• 3Y*: 26.53%
• 5Y*: 13.03%
• 10Y*: 17.59%

EHSTX

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 1.93%
• YTD: 12.69%
• 6M: 14.13%
• 1Y: 24.40%
• 3Y*: 15.23%
• 5Y*: 9.15%
• 10Y*: 10.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIFGX vs. EHSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EIFGX Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund	8.24%	14.48%	42.07%	42.23%	-32.01%	16.33%	44.64%	35.77%	0.68%	25.44%
EHSTX Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund	12.69%	12.11%	11.25%	7.93%	-2.80%	24.25%	2.29%	30.84%	-6.96%	14.79%

Correlation

The correlation between EIFGX and EHSTX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012	0.71

The correlation between EIFGX and EHSTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (3 years) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EIFGX vs. EHSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIFGX

EIFGX Risk / Return Rank: 24
EIFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
EIFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
EIFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
EIFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
EIFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

EHSTX

EHSTX Risk / Return Rank: 59
EHSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
EHSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
EHSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
EHSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
EHSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIFGX vs. EHSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund (EIFGX) and Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EIFGX	EHSTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	2.19	-0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	3.07	-1.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.39	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.49	2.94	-1.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.43	11.89	-6.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EIFGX vs. EHSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIFGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the EHSTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIFGX and EHSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EIFGX	EHSTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.45	2.19	-0.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.62	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	0.63	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	0.53	+0.32

Drawdowns

EIFGX vs. EHSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIFGX drawdown since its inception was -36.93%, smaller than the maximum EHSTX drawdown of -53.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIFGX and EHSTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EIFGX	EHSTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.93%	-53.47%	+16.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.60%	-8.29%	-6.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.85%	-16.44%	-5.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.93%	-16.44%	-20.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.93%	-39.30%	+2.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.40%	-0.13%	-1.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.90%	-7.40%	+1.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.00%	2.04%	+1.96%

Volatility

EIFGX vs. EHSTX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund (EIFGX) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX) at 3.09%. This indicates that EIFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EHSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EIFGX	EHSTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.33%	3.09%	+0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.43%	8.29%	+3.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.99%	11.14%	+3.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.03%	14.74%	+7.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.73%	17.27%	+4.46%

EIFGX vs. EHSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIFGX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than EHSTX's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

EIFGX vs. EHSTX - Dividend Comparison

EIFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.40%, more than EHSTX's 5.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EHSTX Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund	5.40%	6.12%	4.03%	2.93%	4.25%	7.32%	1.94%	2.76%	10.94%	5.88%	1.33%	11.02%
EIFGX Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opportunities Fund	23.40%	25.32%	10.78%	2.74%	32.69%	16.44%	8.74%	9.36%	10.11%	0.29%	0.00%	1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EIFGX and EHSTX in my portfolio?

EIFGX and EHSTX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EIFGX or EHSTX?

EIFGX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to EHSTX (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIFGX dropped -36.93% vs EHSTX's -53.47%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EHSTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.