PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EHSTX vs. FRDPX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EHSTX and FRDPX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

EHSTX vs. FRDPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX) and Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.35%
-3.63%
EHSTX
FRDPX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EHSTX:

1.20

FRDPX:

0.36

Sortino Ratio

EHSTX:

1.66

FRDPX:

0.51

Omega Ratio

EHSTX:

1.22

FRDPX:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

EHSTX:

1.34

FRDPX:

0.34

Martin Ratio

EHSTX:

4.41

FRDPX:

1.24

Ulcer Index

EHSTX:

3.13%

FRDPX:

3.74%

Daily Std Dev

EHSTX:

11.54%

FRDPX:

12.79%

Max Drawdown

EHSTX:

-53.77%

FRDPX:

-52.49%

Current Drawdown

EHSTX:

-6.99%

FRDPX:

-11.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EHSTX achieves a 2.76% return, which is significantly higher than FRDPX's 2.04% return. Over the past 10 years, EHSTX has underperformed FRDPX with an annualized return of 4.71%, while FRDPX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.08% annualized return.


EHSTX

YTD

2.76%

1M

2.96%

6M

3.35%

1Y

13.59%

5Y*

5.27%

10Y*

4.71%

FRDPX

YTD

2.04%

1M

-6.78%

6M

-3.63%

1Y

3.90%

5Y*

5.83%

10Y*

7.08%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EHSTX vs. FRDPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EHSTX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than FRDPX's 0.85% expense ratio.


EHSTX
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund
Expense ratio chart for EHSTX: current value at 1.01% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.01%
Expense ratio chart for FRDPX: current value at 0.85% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.85%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EHSTX vs. FRDPX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EHSTX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EHSTX is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EHSTX is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EHSTX is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EHSTX is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EHSTX is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EHSTX is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

FRDPX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FRDPX is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FRDPX is 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FRDPX is 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FRDPX is 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FRDPX is 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FRDPX is 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EHSTX vs. FRDPX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX) and Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EHSTX, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.200.36
The chart of Sortino ratio for EHSTX, currently valued at 1.66, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.660.51
The chart of Omega ratio for EHSTX, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.221.08
The chart of Calmar ratio for EHSTX, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.001.340.34
The chart of Martin ratio for EHSTX, currently valued at 4.41, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.004.411.24
EHSTX
FRDPX

The current EHSTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the FRDPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EHSTX and FRDPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.20
0.36
EHSTX
FRDPX

Dividends

EHSTX vs. FRDPX - Dividend Comparison

EHSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than FRDPX's 0.83% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EHSTX
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund
0.98%1.01%0.98%1.10%1.01%1.23%1.18%1.45%1.23%1.33%1.56%1.71%
FRDPX
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund
0.83%0.85%0.99%0.93%0.56%0.82%1.03%1.29%1.11%1.63%1.30%1.15%

Drawdowns

EHSTX vs. FRDPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EHSTX drawdown since its inception was -53.77%, roughly equal to the maximum FRDPX drawdown of -52.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHSTX and FRDPX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-6.99%
-11.13%
EHSTX
FRDPX

Volatility

EHSTX vs. FRDPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX) is 4.40%, while Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) has a volatility of 8.80%. This indicates that EHSTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRDPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.40%
8.80%
EHSTX
FRDPX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab