EHSTX vs. FRDPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX) and Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX).
EHSTX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Sep 23, 1931. FRDPX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jan 14, 1987.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EHSTX or FRDPX.
Key characteristics
| EHSTX | FRDPX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 16.95% | 15.85% |
| 1Y Return | 28.03% | 21.79% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.61% | 1.64% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.30% | 9.31% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 1.69% | 8.17% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.44 | 1.89 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.48 | 2.43 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.45 | 1.37 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.04 | 1.48 |
| Martin Ratio | 16.54 | 10.71 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.63% | 1.93% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.07% | 10.92% |
| Max Drawdown | -53.77% | -52.49% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.07% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between EHSTX and FRDPX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EHSTX vs. FRDPX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EHSTX achieves a 16.95% return, which is significantly higher than FRDPX's 15.85% return. Over the past 10 years, EHSTX has underperformed FRDPX with an annualized return of 1.69%, while FRDPX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.17% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EHSTX vs. FRDPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EHSTX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than FRDPX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EHSTX vs. FRDPX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX) and Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EHSTX vs. FRDPX - Dividend Comparison
EHSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than FRDPX's 0.80% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EHSTX Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund | 0.91% | 0.98% | 1.10% | 1.01% | 1.23% | 1.18% | 1.45% | 1.23% | 1.33% | 1.56% | 1.71% | 1.11% |
FRDPX Franklin Rising Dividends Fund | 0.80% | 0.99% | 0.93% | 0.56% | 0.82% | 1.03% | 1.29% | 1.11% | 1.63% | 1.30% | 1.15% | 0.88% |
Drawdowns
EHSTX vs. FRDPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EHSTX drawdown since its inception was -53.77%, roughly equal to the maximum FRDPX drawdown of -52.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHSTX and FRDPX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EHSTX vs. FRDPX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Value Fund (EHSTX) has a higher volatility of 3.89% compared to Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) at 3.41%. This indicates that EHSTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRDPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.